Quote:
Originally posted by seretogis
I've yet to see anything concrete come from the investigations against Halliburton. Facts > speculation.
|
http://www.construction.com/NewsCent.../20040123a.asp
http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/20.../index_np.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4163810/
I could go on, but I'm sure you'll just say it's all lies or allegations. If you want to think Halliburton are as clean as snow, then go ahead. I'm not going to convince you otherwise.
Quote:
So, why would you want to replace a corrupt US presence with a corrupt UN presence?
|
Well, for starters it's not certain that any UN presence would be corrupt. You're already showing your bias in that comment.
Secondly,
because the UN represent International engagement, International law, consensus and shared contributions and responsibilities. Is that enough?
How about, a US led occupation represents.... erm, well, it represents the US occupying an Arab country. That's the whole problem, isn't it?
Quote:
Is it just a matter of having anyone except the US in Iraq?
|
No
Quote:
If that's the case, let's give North Korea the keys and see what happens.
|
Right... Very constructive...
Mr Mephisto