Quote:
Originally posted by tecoyah
It will be intersting to see how long it takes before Clinton is blamed for this one too. I would have so much more respect for the administration if they simply accepted "ANY" fault for the lack of direction in preventing this tragedy. There is of course little chance anyone could have prevented 9/11, but at least have the balls to admit you may have been unprepared, and had information issues.
|
Right on man... it's good to see that some people aren't becoming blinded by all these alligations against the Bush administration. These 9/11 hearings to me are a complete joke... just a bunch of Democrats who would like nothing more than to see Kerry elected.
Two points I'd like to make... the memo mentions 1998, during which time Clinton was president. Does anyone know that the Clinton administration was offered Osama bin Laden and had plenty of opportunity to catch him? Here's a link to an article explaining in further detail...
Click Here. Some reports say that Clinton warned Bush about this threat, yet if he was so worried, why wasn't the problem taken care of?
And what do people think is better... Bush waging a war on terrorism, or Clinton selling weapon secrets to China (a well known adversary of ours)? Clinton's re-election was funded in part by illegal campain contributions made by the Chinese. Here's a link that supports part of what I said:
Click Here .
I'm sure, however, that a great deal of this information can be found by those that seek it, and I hope that this comes out in the following months preceeding the election. Bush is not the enemy here that many Democrats are making him out to be.