Quote:
Originally posted by onetime2
Statements like this are what drag your other arguments down. There has been no evidence of criminal action, no censure or impeachment hearings, no criminal cases whatsoever with regard to Bush administration actions.
Accusations with no basis in fact should not be part of any meaningful discussion.
|
You are correct.....no impeachment hearings, But there probably should be if we follow the guidelines set for the previous administration. Think about it.
Clinton faces impeachment for lying about sex acts.
Bush does not after lying about reasoning for WAR.
Clintons actions kill the reputation of an intern.
Bushs actions kill hundreds of Soldiers.
The media reports on a daily basis, the perverted actions of Clinton, "Wag the dog" becomes a common statement.
The media under-reports the possibly illegal actions of the Bush administration, and regardless of the "wag the dog" similarities(far closer in this case), the term is never used.
The only difference, obvious in this case. Republicans are in "COMPLETE" control of the government and, mostly control the media. Dangerous times, indeed.