Quote:
Originally posted by tecoyah
I dont give a rats ass that Clinton was weak on terrorism....he never claimed to be fighting a war on it.It amazes me how every critisism directed at GWB and his administration, quickly becomes an attack on somebody else. Why not just stick to the present, and the future as we can actually effect them both with actions we take.
Hows this.....Clinton didnt do his job as well as we would have liked, and in fact failed in many regards. END OF STATEMENT>
Now.....perhaps we can discuss what is happening with the current administration and the failures and shortcomings happening today.There is evidence availible showing the disregard for our safety as a nation, perpetrated by the very men who now claim to be fighting a war on terrorism. There is evidence showing a purposeful push to attack a country for reasons other than defense of the united states. There are insinuations of deceit from the administration towards the people of this country(read propoganda).
*discuss*
|
In case you missed it,
I criticized every administration from Carter onward with regard to terrorism. I responded only to the ridiculous assertion that Clinton was winning some supposed war on terror while he was in office.
The Bush administration has taken more steps to combat terrorism than any of the ones before it and Iraq is a part of those steps. The fight against terrorism is not just about 9/11 but about all countries who support terrorism and there is no doubt that Iraq supported it. Of course, they were forced to finally act against terrorism by 9/11. I have no doubt had 9/11 not happened they would have taken no serious steps to eliminate terrorism.