|
Okay, so Top-Viewer does make a few stupid points, but what about the damage in the lobby? Apparently there is evidence of this on videotape. What about fighter planes not being dispatched? What about the unusually low attendance at the WTC that day? What about the increasing number of people saying that burning jet fuel 80 floors up could not - no way no how, never - cause entire buildings to collapse in the way the WTC towers did. I mean, think about it intuitively: imagine heating up a metal beam - even one with a heavy weight on top - until a part of it near the top is red hot - is the whole fucking thing going to crumble to the earth? Now that's just an intuitive view, there are actual scientists with credentials that deny that that sort of thing could ever happen without a precisely coordinated series of explosions.
Oh, and there's lots more questions about 9/11 than the way the towers came down.
|