Is it true that if a man could experience a female orgasm

He would possibly die of shock do the intensity of pleasure?

If so, how come its men that normally more into sex than women?

 

Yes, I expect we would. It is a matter of record that men can only take so much pleasure before dying of shock.

Not sure on your second point. If that was the case, why do I have to fight the bitches off with a stick?

I expect it's pheremones or something. Whatever it is, it's tiresome. Damn.

 

Not knowing how a man's orgasm feels it's hard to say.

If a woman's orgasm is indeed more intense than a man's could it be surmised that it is also more satisfying overall, thereby reducing the need to repeat it as often?

It could just as easily be surmised that a man's orgasm is so much better than a woman's that he wants to repeat the experience as often as possible.

I used to think about sex more often than I do now but even at my height, I wasn't thinking about it as much as the men I was with. Then again, men are bombarded with more visual triggers than women are. Tits, ass, legs, you name it, it's on full display constantly. What do we women have in our faces on a regular basis? If we seek it out we might be able to discern the bulge in a guy's pants or note his nice man ass in a pair of gym shorts. Women probably get more visually stimulated by other women than they do by men.

 

Did you REALLY ask that?

 

The bitch repellent deodorant I bought you is obviously not working then.

 

Dunno. I smeared my stick with it, liberally.

 

More stiff dicks walking down the street, throbbing majestically through some flimsy material would be helpful, yes.

 

How long have you been a member of TFP Strange?

I've had 3 girlfriends and they've all exhasted me sex-wise. And no, men wouldn't die of the intensity of pleasure. Otherwise on hit of heroin or Cocaine would instantly kill us.

 

I'll issue a local ordinance to that effect. I'm just a little worried that you may take even longer on your shopping trips than you do already, though.

 

This sounds like something Todd Akin would ask...

 

So the one's I fake don't count?

 

Correct.

Only the legitimate orgasms count.

 

I read it on Yahoo Answers.

I think to equate this with a guy who thinks "legit rape" and "pretend rape" is pretty insensitive and stupid on your part.
--- merged: Aug 23, 2012 at 3:58 PM ---
Would Female Orgasms Kill Men? - source

 

Or....

This question is so beyond stupid that the only place to take it is in a direction as equally stupid.

You can substitute stupid for asinine, over generalized and other such words if it makes you feel better.

 

The link isnt to yahoo answers, its an article. You probably shouldnt rubbish it is you havent even read it or looked at it for 1 second.

 

So THAT'S why professors failed my papers for citing Y!Answers and Wikipedia!

The more you know...

Oh, and I read the "source" and my opinion still stands.

 

There is a clear difference - even if my question had no basis in scientific theory (although it does have such a basis)

Thinking that most people are raped arent really "legit" rapes is offensive.

Even if I am wrong (and I didnt say I believed that it was definitely the case, just that I had read it in a few places) that isnt the same as someone causing deliberate offense.

So whether you want to call your actions stupid or asinine or just rude is up to you, but they were wrong.

 

BRB..

I'm going to go write up an article about the science on the density of some people on a random internet board then pose the question to Y! answers and Wiki...

I'll share my results soon.

 

Since 2002 or 2003 I think.