1. We've had very few donations over the year. I'm going to be short soon as some personal things are keeping me from putting up the money. If you have something small to contribute it's greatly appreciated. Please put your screen name as well so that I can give you credit. Click here: Donations
    Dismiss Notice

Gay history to be taught in CA public schools.

Discussion in 'General Discussions' started by cynthetiq, Jul 15, 2011.

  1. cynthetiq

    cynthetiq Administrator Staff Member Donor

    Location:
    New York City
    Interesting, in the 70s it was busing, in the 80s, gangs, 90s I haven't a clue. But this is a reason to get kids out of public school systems?

     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Charlatan

    Charlatan sous les pavés, la plage

    Location:
    Temasek
    This is probably getting blown out of proportion.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    America is such a strange, strange place.
     
  4. MSD

    MSD Very Tilted

    Location:
    CT
    The children of parents who object to this are the ones who will benefit the most.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  5. Charlatan

    Charlatan sous les pavés, la plage

    Location:
    Temasek
    MSD... that is a mouthful of truth right there.
     
  6. genuinemommy

    genuinemommy Moderator Staff Member

    In our history classes, we didn't cover any history after world war 2. There was other stuff in the textbook, including the civil rights movement, the Vietnam war, Watergate, and Gay Rights, but we never touched on those topics. I do think that it would have benefited me to learn relatively recent history, but I can see why the teachers chose to leave it out - there was so much to cover in topics that wouldn't bring controversy to the classroom... I guess I'm crazy to think that Gay History should be grouped in this category of recent-not-too-essential-stuff.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  7. Charlatan

    Charlatan sous les pavés, la plage

    Location:
    Temasek
    Interestingly, when I was first learning of the WW2, it was 30 to 40 years in the past. The civil rights movement, Vietnam, Watergate, Stonewall and the gay rights movement, etc. are all now 30 to 40 years in the past.

    I don't think we can call this history too recent anymore.
     
  8. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    Stonewall in particular is fundamentally important as far as gay rights is concerned. It's not merely a shame if they don't teach it in history/social science classes; it's an educational failure.
     
  9. snowy

    snowy so kawaii Staff Member

    Usually, we didn't get to the more recent history because we ran out of time.

    I don't see what the big deal is. I think these events are about as controversial as the women's rights movement. We've come to accept studying that, and I think in the future people will come to accept studying the gay rights movement as well. I think California is doing a great thing by including this in their curriculum. It is important to draw attention to the movements of the disenfranchised. I think it makes us value what we have, given the struggles of those before us.
     
  10. cj2112

    cj2112 Slightly Tilted

    Here's the deal. As long as society makes a big deal about race, gender, and sexual orientation, etc. we as a society will always treat those minority groups as different. I think that race, gender, or sexual orientation is about as important to a persons accomplishments as what brand of shoes they preferred. It shouldn't be a reason that they get mentioned in a history book, but rather just another trivial bit of info about the person. A persons successes and failures should stand alone regardless of that kind of stuff.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    The key is in distinguishing between obsessing over "He's the first black president" or "She's a successful mompreneur" and acknowledging things like barriers erected and reinforced based on race, gender, and sexual orientation.

    The key is realizing what is historically significant and what is somewhat ironic in terms of prejudice.
     
  12. Bodkin van Horn

    Bodkin van Horn One of the Four Horsewomyn of the Fempocalypse

    I see what you're doing here and I approve.

    I think we can abandon treating groups differently once we've decided to treat them all equally for a while.
     
  13. Charlatan

    Charlatan sous les pavés, la plage

    Location:
    Temasek
    And this is pretty much what the problem is... There are many that suggest we just, "move on". The problem with that is we aren't all treated equally yet. There are still struggles (such as Same Sex Marriage or Equal Pay) that need to be dealt with before we can move on and treat everyone the same.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Ice|Burn

    Ice|Burn Getting Tilted

    See that's my thought. I totally applaud and understand the need and desire to teach the history, if for nothing else then to help broaden understanding.

    But at the same time I think it's singling a select group of people out. Making everyone stop, point, say "ohhhh," and then move on. I think we need to get past labels of black and white, homo or heterosexual and just be human beings.
     
  15. Bodkin van Horn

    Bodkin van Horn One of the Four Horsewomyn of the Fempocalypse

    I agree that this should be the ultimate goal. I don't think that it's something that can really be planned on. I know at some point it became okay to be Irish in the US. I can't pinpoint the exact year, but I know it happened. Part of the process is the normalization. I think having gay characters on TV who are complete characters wholly apart from being gay is going to go a long way. I think we will be a lot closer when teaching gay history isn't a big deal anymore.
     
  16. Charlatan

    Charlatan sous les pavés, la plage

    Location:
    Temasek
    That's all well and good but how does one talk about the struggle and accomplishment of any group (e.g. Black history, Women's rights, etc.) without acknowledging that difference or the reason why what had been done (e.g. emancipation, gaining the vote, etc.).

    The solution is not simply to ignore it because then you are back to teaching the "white man's history" and that is no solution.
     
  17. Ice|Burn

    Ice|Burn Getting Tilted

    Exactly. It's the shock value of it right now. And with the 24 hour news networks having to literally invent news to justify their existence, when things such as this come up they will continue to get blown out of proportion. Heck with the American public's memory on par with that of a gold fish, it'll only be another week or two at most before this "controversy" is forgotten about.
     
  18. Bodkin van Horn

    Bodkin van Horn One of the Four Horsewomyn of the Fempocalypse

    I think the ultimate goal that I envision is integration to the point where there isn't a clear distinction between any of these groups and the dominant culture. It hasn't really gotten to that point with nonwhite minority groups or non-hetero and/or non-male groups.

    To go back to the mick example, no one cares about the Irish contribution to history because nobody cares if anyone else is Irish. I'd like to reach that type of across the board identity apathy. We're nowhere near it right now. That being the case, I'm all for underrepresented groups getting more cultural representation.
     
  19. Charlatan

    Charlatan sous les pavés, la plage

    Location:
    Temasek
    The thing with the Irish is that once you lose the accent (one generation) you lose the difference.

    Skin colour, gender and sexual orientation are little more stand outish...

    That said, I agree that "identity apathy" is what is needed. I am just not convinced it will ever fully happen.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. Ice|Burn

    Ice|Burn Getting Tilted

    Not as long as we have parents (and society for that matter) telling us that someone of a different skin color or sexual orientation is different and should be shunned.