Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Technology


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-18-2003, 08:20 PM   #1 (permalink)
Upright
 
Mega stupid linux/windows question

Hi, I think I'll be giving up my geek card for asking such a stupid question but here it goes.

I run mostly linux, however I have a dual boot that I use for games. Now, My deal is, I've got an NTFS partition that I would ideally like to see under both OSes. Works fine in Win2k (shock) but I can't even find it as a drive under Linux (running redhat 8 on this particular box). NTFS support is compiled in my kernel, I just can't mount the partition (mainly because it doesn't exist as far as linux is concerned o_O ) .
Idolmind86 is offline  
Old 05-18-2003, 08:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
Loves my girl in thongs
 
arch13's Avatar
 
Location: North of Mexico, South of Canada
Fat32

fat32 support is availible in all Kernal distros, and has a much greater compatability level. You can convert the ntfs partition to fat32 easier than you think, and then the partition will be viewable under both unix/linux and mac environments. All around crosss compatability is always the way to go.
__________________
Seen on an employer evaluation:

"The wheel is turning but the hamsters dead"
____________________________
Is arch13 really a porn diety ? find out after the film at 11.
-Nanofever
arch13 is offline  
Old 05-18-2003, 08:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
Insane
 
Yeah, be careful with Linux and NTFS...the NTFS isn't supported by default for a reason...something about the way Linux closes writes.
__________________
My sig can beat up your honor student.
mpedrummer2 is offline  
Old 05-19-2003, 07:47 AM   #4 (permalink)
Psychopathic Akimbo Action Pirate
 
Location: ...between Christ and Belial.
I disagree with the previous posters. Linux kernel NTFS support is great FOR READ-ONLY. Write support is experimental and will likely thrash your NTFS partition. arch13 makes a decent point about FAT32, but NTFS is far superior in my opinion.

So, if you only wish to view and copy files from that NTFS partition, you should be fine.

That said, it sounds like you are doing what you should be doing. What error message do you get when you try to mount your NTFS partition?
__________________
On the outside I'm jazz, but my soul is rock and roll.

Sleep is a waste of time. Join the Insomniac Club.
"GYOH GWAH-DAH GREH BLAAA! SROH WIH DIH FLIH RYOHH!!" - The Locust
Antagony is offline  
Old 05-20-2003, 12:25 AM   #5 (permalink)
Insane
 
Haven't tried it yet: <a href="http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/" target="_blank">linux-ntfs</a>.
Cocktopus is offline  
Old 05-20-2003, 11:57 AM   #6 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Plugged In
1. less /proc/filesystems

If ntfs is listed, you have NTFS support. If not, go grab the appropriate RPM.
http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/info/redhat.html

2. Make a mount point.
mkdir /mnt/windows

3. mount -t ntfs -o ro /dev/hda? /mnt/windows

Replace hda? with the partition that is your ntfs partition. The "-o ro" means read-only. Don't use write support unless you absolutely have to (i.e. an emergency).
Boner is offline  
Old 05-20-2003, 11:58 AM   #7 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Plugged In
Re: Fat32

Quote:
Originally posted by arch13
You can convert the ntfs partition to fat32 easier than you think, and then the partition will be viewable under both unix/linux and mac environments.
Just how do you convert NTFS to FAT32? I've always been under the impression that you can't do that without third party tools.
Boner is offline  
Old 05-20-2003, 02:01 PM   #8 (permalink)
Loves my girl in thongs
 
arch13's Avatar
 
Location: North of Mexico, South of Canada
Ranish Partition manager and partition magic have experimental support (read:at your own risk), and some distros of linux support this experimintal capablity as well. (i'm think here of madrake corporate ed., which just recently began to toy with the concept.) Slashdot.com and forge also have some experimental RPM's availible.
But as always, BACK IT UP.
__________________
Seen on an employer evaluation:

"The wheel is turning but the hamsters dead"
____________________________
Is arch13 really a porn diety ? find out after the film at 11.
-Nanofever
arch13 is offline  
Old 05-21-2003, 10:29 AM   #9 (permalink)
Upright
 
The problem is when I go to even list drives, it doesn't show up at all. There is no hdaX for it. So I can't add it to my devices or even begin to mount it. I tried mounting just a bunch of random hda devices to see if it just wasn't showing up in the drive manager utility but none of them worked.
Idolmind86 is offline  
Old 05-21-2003, 08:38 PM   #10 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Plugged In
Go to a command prompt and execute the following command as root:

fdisk -l /dev/hda

This is what I get on one of my systems:
Disk /dev/hda: 30.7 GB, 30750031872 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3738 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux
/dev/hda2 14 3681 29463210 83 Linux
/dev/hda3 3682 3738 457852+ 82 Linux swap

Granted, I don't have any non-Linux filesystems on this machine, but they will show up.

NTFS partitions will show up as NTFS or possible HPFS (old OS/2 filesystem that shares some heritage with NTFS).
Boner is offline  
Old 05-24-2003, 09:40 PM   #11 (permalink)
Upright
 
I've converted my partitions to fat 32. When I list in Fdisk I get HDA 7 as being a FAT 32 partition.

This is my /etc/fstab
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 255 2048256 b Win95 FAT32
/dev/hda2 256 5494 42082267+ f Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hda5 256 2423 17414428+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda6 2424 2551 1028128+ 82 Linux swap
/dev/hda7 2552 5494 23639616 b Win95 FAT32

When I try and mount I get a fs type FAT32 not supported by kernel. I supposed I have to go back and check... I thought for sure I had FAT32 support also.
Idolmind86 is offline  
Old 05-25-2003, 04:21 PM   #12 (permalink)
Irresponsible
 
yotta's Avatar
 
try vfat instead of fat32
__________________
I am Jack's signature.
yotta is offline  
 

Tags
linux or windows, mega, question, stupid


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:52 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360