a theory on and question for girls with larger breasts
 

actually not a theory, that's incorrect terminology.:rolleyes:
more just simple conjecture.

so, i'm assuming that girls with larger breasts are more likely prone to having them be sexualized. simply by the fact that they are more visible, opportunity to show more cleavage, might be looked at more readily etc etc.

this said, i wonder what the relationship between sexual enjoyment (either as a result of direct physical excitement, or from being worshipped/fetishized/stared at) and breast size.

for example; i wonder if there is a relationship between the amount girls like to have their breasts played with and size.

and, i wonder if there is a relationship between pain play (not just your usual nip tweaking!) and size.

of course, it's very likely that these factors are not correlated- or even opposite (small breasted girl may revel in being played with/paid attention to in the breast area because she doesn't benefit from being able to wear busty cleavage dresses)


in my own experience, i've never been with anybody under a larger B. they all really enjoyed their breasts played with, and the larger in the group definitely liked to be played with the roughest- slapping them, twisting hard, nipple clamps, etc etc.


thoughts? anecdotes? experiences?

According to manswers, girls with breasts ranging from B-C cups that are pear shaped statistically enjoy sex more than girls with larger knockers. Girls with larger tits tend to get hit on more but are said to be a less outgoing in the bedroom arena.

Boobies are great though ... gosh, I love em ...

yes, the girls i've been with that had larger breasts were all very very submissive.

So.. does a breast reduction make a woman more assertive?

What about implants? Do those make girls submissive?

Breasts are sacks of fat attached to the upper torso.

They have as much pull on personality as a large nose.

I dunno, 9er, Jennifer Grey got a nose job and suddenly couldn't act anymore.

I have large breasts DDD.....I am in no way a submissive in bed.....My bf loves for me to take charge in the arena. Also not to keen on the girls getting roughed up, I like a little tweaking but the nips are pretty sensitive. I prefer gentle tongue flicking and sucking...
All the men that I have dated have all been breast men, no shocker there.....I do have men stare at them alot, it's almost like they are mesmerized. I guess I am used to that, but it would be nice if a guy could look me in the eye from time to time....lol

ugh, tfp ate my reply. but i was gonna say something like

well, you're clearly not aware of the effect that psychology can have upon sexuality.

Clearly. However, I do know my lack of a penis has profoundly stunted my ability to get with the ladies.

...

I've road tested girls from A to DD and the only thing I've noticed is chicks with bazookas aren't as athletic. IMHO, YMMV, ROFLMSSO.

Suggesting that breast size makes a girl X is like saying age, race, missing limbs, etc. makes a girl X. These are generalizations at best.

...

Are guys with bigger wangs more assertive? If so, we should start a thread titled "Bigger Dick = Bigger Dick."

...

Also, tits are great but the reality is that they get used for their intended purpose about as much as the middle bench seat belt on a pickup.

why wouldn't breast size affect sexual psyche? it's an obvious and conspicuous feature of sexuality, unlike penis size.

being ogled since you were 12 or, conversely, never being looked at in the breast department may very well have some effect upon the sexual psyche of an individual. unlike say... skin colour or missing a limb as you suggest, it is almost immediately, and very readily fetishized. and therefore a girl can derive some power and enjoyment from it, or, perhaps a girl who has never garnered much attention towards her chest may disproportionately enjoy extra attention in the bedroom.

---------- Post added at 05:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:51 PM ----------

and what is their intended purpose exactly?
win male attention?
encourage monogamous relationships? (sexual and/or social)

do tell, citing specific examples.

Tenacious. I can dig. Let's change the title to, "a theory on and question for larger girls."

Do fat girls get hit on as much as skinny girls? How does this influence their sexuality?

Is the urban legend that all fat girls give head like champs to compensate for their BMI true?

PURPOSE: Uh, turns out breasts are used for breast feeding infants. That is their purpose.

SOURCE: I've got a picture of a baby sucking on a tit but I don't want to NSFW this thread.

EXAMPLE: I can't confirm it myself, but my mother once stated that I was breastfed as a child.

From a Darwin-of-the-Nasty perspective, sure, breasts may be shaped to attract men. I mean, gorillas don't sport big round tatas. I can't see them contributing to monogamous relationships, however, because there isn't a man on the planet that wouldn't mind having a couple of sets to play with on the weekend. But that's more of an extension of human (male) sexuality, the desire for novelty and thus new partners, than just blaming boobs.

moot. sexuality and "being fat" and "sexuality and breasts" are two very different things.

do we not live in a world of multitudes?

are these assumptions or meticulously researched hypotheses?

I've been with several chicks with large breasts that did not get anything out of them being played with, and some of them were just horrible in the sack. I've been with girls with small breasts that enjoyed them or some that had to real feeling in them. It depends on the girl and her physiology.

Plus that thing about fat chicks giving good head isn't always true, sadly I found this out.

are you using the term submissive interchangably with the term inhibitive? Because these are two different things. I can be submissive in bed and be hot as hell and make his balls blue (topping from the bottom) until I let him come, which is very very different than inhibitive...which I am anything but...

so...maybe the women are inhibitive, not submissive?

Your whole original post talks about what women might like to have done TO their breasts. Nothing about what they do WITH their breasts. Perhaps you are just more attracted to submissive women...
But a woman with large breasts can certainly use them to give pleasure in an active way. Just as a man uses his dick in an active way. And in the same way, some are better, more creative, and pay more attention to what works for their partner, than others.

Pain play is not my D-cup of tea,:no: but I have orgasmed from moderately strong stimulation of both nips at the same time.

Sheesh!! big deal...:shakehead:I doubt that the "intended purpose" of eight fingers and two opposable thumbs was to play the piano or saxophone either.

Lindy

excellent, thank you for this addition.


yes, i've heard many times about the nipple orgasm. i've never exactly attempted it, although i'm sure it might be possible on more girls than one would think.

tips?

It could be coincidence, but the larger-breasted women I've been with have enjoyed their breasts being played with more than those who were small-breasted. Also, I haven't noticed a correlation between large-breasted=more submissive.

Tusko, it probably varies from woman to woman. Only two of my partners ever orgasmed from nipple stimulation. One achieved this from sucking, the other from light twisting.