Men: Are you "Good Will Humping?"
 

A funny little article from Claude Mills entitled "GOOD WILL HUMPING"

Obvious point: Ugly is subjective at best. I like nerdy girls, myself. Leave that Paris Hilton crap for others guys.

Underline was placed for emphasis. Rest of the article was posted for humor.

Show of hands... who is honest enough to admit this slice of reality?

Nerdy chicks can be good looking, they only don't know how to 'use it'.

As for the concept. No, but the longer I'd go without the more willing I'd be and the lower my 'standards' would become when I was younger.

Now, no, I don't get that desperate, even if its been a while.

No.

Apparently, I tend to have sex with women who come to me. That is my criteria for selection. Well, at least the beginning of it.

I like nerdy girls too.

I'm not really sure what 'ugly means.'


I tend to only fuck 10s. At least five 2s.

No, I'm not going to have sex with a woman that I think is physically ugly. I would go out with a woman that was considered a bit of a "plain Jane" or only average in looks. If she turns out to have a nice personality, I might consider a relationship with her. Looks are important, but personality is more important in my opinion.

I honestly don't mind girl with a bit of weight, but the face needs to be nice looking ;)

First of all, Nerdy and ugly are not synonymous. Nerdy can be very sexy.

Secondly, I had sex with a girl whom I did not find attractive. I don't think many men would find her attractive. Her vag even had quite a rotten odor. After the act ended, I couldn't get away fast enough. That was the last of my ugly girl sex. No more for me.

I know you all have banged some shovel-faced bimbos! FESS UP!

OK, OK, I did, yes it's true. But I was in high school and the chick could deep throat.......

I remember some of my friends ragging on my about my "ugly" girlfriend. I could only smile to myself as I thought of what those poor bastards were missing out on. :thumbsup:

Nowadays, if it weren't for the being married part, I wouldn't be afraid to ask a 5~6 out. Sexy beautiful is not the same as pretty beautiful. I'd rather be with someone compatible and have fun than worry about some trophy partner.

Thanks, man. Everybody has done it. Some of us admit it freely.

Deep throat is proof that god loves us and wants us to be happy.

Not if you hit it from behind.

I don't. And won't.


I'm sorry to girls out there with self-esteem issues. I know I'm the reason. And I don't really care.

Does this mean that having had morning sex on numerous occasions I am most definitely not an ugly chick then?

I've only ever had a relationship with one guy I wasn't attracted to visually (I don't do one night stands so no real charity screws) and even then the fact that his kisses tasted like a mixture of vanilla, nutmeg and cinnamon kinda made up for it. Gods above he was addictive.

Hey King... that's the kind of honestly I love around here!

As for the OP, I'd say "it's possible". I like "nerdy" girls as well. I also have a skewed view of beauty and prefer cute to sexy, or rather find cute sexier than supermodel looks. Some of the girls I find very attractive, I find them so for very specific reasons.

I am just like WK. I fuck 9s and 10s exclusively.

One time in my life I banged a girl that wasn't 'ugly' but wasn't super hot either, and it seemed not worth my time. I got rid of it pretty soon after that.

That makes me an asshole to most people, but hey... assholes are the ones who get the fucking hot ones so it works pretty damn nicely.



But I'm glad whoever wrote that article is taking the heat off me. Someones gotta bang the ugly wimminz. Somehow some of the ugly dudes get hot bitches, but rarely does a hot girl get a hot dude. So there is a disproportionate amount of ugly women wanting to bang and less ugly dudes to keep the social ladder together correctly.

There's no accounting for taste. Some guys like girls with a bit of meat on their bones, some guys like the Paris aesthetic. Dark skin, light skin, glasses, whatever makes you happy.

I may be the only guy in the world who does not rate women on a scale of one to ten. Instead, my rating system is decidedly simpler; I'd sleep with her or I wouldn't. Every girl falls into one of the two categories. Back in my.. eh.. less scrupulous days, more tended to fall into the former. Now it tends to go the other way, as I've learned that looks aren't all there is to the equation.

I have noticed that the girls I end up with tend to be the ones that get a lot of male attention, so that probably means they rate pretty high. And then there was the one who was a ten (even I had that pegged)... and bi-sexual... and had a pierced tongue...

What was I talking about?

You must not be familiar with the advanced rating system Martian. Any 10 with pierced tongue and bi-sexual is no longer judged on the standard system.

She moves to the advanced, which only consists of 11, 12 and 20.

I think you banged an 11 or 12 (20 is reserved for the best fuck of your entire life, you can only score someone a 20 on your deathbed or minutes before a fatal accident... thus the relative rarity of the score being given out)

This thread is inane.

Hey, I thought this was a men-only thread.... :p

/threadjack


Well then, i'm guessing i'm one of those rare 20's...I feel I'm a 10, and although i don't have a pierced tongue, i can deepthroat and i have quite a long tongue that can do a wave motion (lots of practice) and although i'm not bi-sexual...i would absolutely love to have sex with a woman :D aka "I want to have a threesome"

and healer's not even on his deathbed :D

And it may seem I'm tooting my own horn a little here, i feel that i kinda need to in this particular thread.

:thumbsup:

sorry for the threadjack.

/end threadjack

I'd go so far as to say it's an embarrassment to the TFP.

But hey, unless I'm at *least* a "5-6," (god forbid) I'm sure it doesn't matter what I think. :rolleyes:

And now, feel free to respond with as many "Heyyyy, we're just joking, lighten up..." comments as you want. It won't work.

BTW: Mandy, you should never feel you have to toot your own horn like that here, if this place is really what it purports to be. But apparently "evolution" means being allowed to act like neanderthals.

This statement may or may not be applicable to this thread: There are very few truly ugly women in the world. However, there are very many truly shallow men.

I agree. It's really shallow to consider only her facial features...I mean, after all, she could have a really hot bod!:expressionless:

Welcome to the TFP equivalent of an evolutionary dead end. Just like the neanderthals.

Perhaps this thread should be merged with the "Dumb People" thread.

I think this thread should be merged with the garbage can, myself. Free speech is all and good, but this is just one race dumping on another and basing our actions on their looks, something that they can't control. BTW, I've seen more really beautiful women with really ugly guys, which gives credence to the theory that women are a lot less shallow then men.

Yeah, this is more of a Fark thread than a TFP one.

If this thread is offending anyone or violating the rules... it should be taken down by the mods.

Uh, it's not violating any rules, dude...it's just stupid.

Unfortunately that is not against the rules.

Bullshit.

It gives credence that women look for different things in males than males do in females.

I very rarely see a ugly rich man with an ugly woman, I doubt its because she was 'less shallow'.

Women are no different than men in this kind of thing.

Hell I really really love my wife. Shes everything to me. Yet I still want her to be attractive to me, and if she were to let herself go, I'd be very upset and if it was bad enough and she didn't care, it would be a great strain on our relationship.

Shes also a stay at home mom, watching the kids that sort of thing. If I said 'honey why don't you go back to work and I'll be the stay at home dad' I'm sure that would upset her greatly. Maybe it wouldn't lead to a divorce, maybe it would, but it would strain our relationship.

Are we shallow? I don't think so. We were attracted to each other for multiple reasons in order to live our lives happily together. For me looks were high on that list, her her it was my confidence, (it wasn't money I didn't have any) and how I made her feel.

The article was mean spirited. What it didn't mention was normally guys who act/do this are NOT very attractive themselves. Its a way they justify their own lousy sex lives. Its like Quazimoto talking about how he banged the ugly chick. Sure 'preying' on someone with low self esteem is easier, but its a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

Nevermind.

Beauty...or ugly, if you prefer...I think, is more arbitrary than subjective. I, myself, tend to be more attracted by a more unconventional beauty. You mentioned Paris Hilton. Frankly, I don't really find Ms Hilton to be all that attractive, physically. I'd take a Janeane Garofalo over a Paris Hilton any day of the week.


Earlier, I alluded to an attraction to Janeane Garofalo. Somewhere, on these boards, is a picture of you as a dead ringer for Ms Garofalo.
That's hot.
And it does, by the way, matter what you think. Regardless of where you happen to fall on my, or anyone elses "attractive scale".

Okay seriously: male and female are GENDERS, not RACES. It is one of my worst pet peeves. Race is a subspecies and refers to things like different ethnicities in humans, not the sex.

Hmm deepthroat, wants a threesome... I've seen your pictures... Well I'd say at the least an 11. I'm also not on my deathbed so my god given right to give a 20 has not yet been achieved!



(Offtopic: If you don't like the thread gtfo of it people, you dont have to post in every thread on the board. Especially when you obviously have nothing to add to the conversation except try to pretend you are morally superior to the people chatting)

I don't post in every thread on the board. I'm voicing my opinion on the topic at hand. You don't like it? GTFO, dude. :rolleyes:

And I love it when people go traipsing off on the 'you think you're morally superior' trailway because someone disagrees with them. No, dude, I'm disagreeing because I think this thread is stupid...has nothing to do with morality.

I really cannot put into words at the moment how pissed off this thread makes me

besides ugly is in the eye of the beholder....

I've found that guys that think this way do not possess the personality that I require from a partner so I guess Im not really missing out, because personality wins over looks ANY day for me....but what do I know...Im not all that attractive AND Im fat

guess thats why Im damn good in bed huh?

Thanks for the kind words, BOR... but that line you quoted from me was actually written with sarcasm, not a desire for validation. I wrote it to point out the asininity of what several people were saying here.

I'm glad to see some of the TFP men standing up and making sure that their silence doesn't ensure their complicity with these kinds of attitudes.

didn't mean you

btw if you've seen me around here and there, my POV is often times different than many of the other TFP people. Usually its well thought out and they will argue it with me (of course I'm hardheaded so sometimes it takes a few times =0)

but this neanderthal talk, stupidity talk, is just uncalled for acting like people are better.

when i first saw this thread i wonder how it would take until someone posted in anger, resentment...whatever you want to call it.


i don't understand if you don't like the thread don't read it or post in it. if the mods have not removed it i don't see what the big deal is.

I really don't have any strong feelings one way or the other about this thread. I've had physical relationships with plenty of women, some of which had many wonderful features excluding great beauty.

The OP is a sort of cruel way to say something nice: looks aren't everything. Many, many, many women (or for the ladies, many men) who may not be very attractive can be wonderful and fascinating people that can brighten your life and earn your affection, be it emotional or physical, without having to be traditionally beautiful. That's it. Yes, it was said in a Sam Kinison manner, but so what?

So what you're saying is that you only want to hear from people who agree with you? I really don't see any other way to take that kind of statement. If this were a thread about why sticking beans up one's nose and waiting for them to sprout was a fantastic idea, I'd chime in that the thread was a waste of time and space, just like I've done in this one.

As MM has already pointed out, there's not rule against being dense on this board. I don't see much difference between my hypothetical thread and this one.

I'm not here to agree with everyone, and I don't see any problem with saying that a thread is dumb. Some of them are - the hand thread yesterday was a great example. No one has said anything personally offensive about anyone else in this thread, and that's the Back Button Test. Having a differing opinion, and sharing it is encouraged.