Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Politics (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/)
-   -   Do you think WMD's will ever be found in Iraq? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/10258-do-you-think-wmds-will-ever-found-iraq.html)

The_Dude 06-05-2003 07:11 AM

Do you think WMD's will ever be found in Iraq?
 
i doubt it, because US and brit troops are scouring the area, and if they cant find any in all this time = they dont exist.

all that crap before the war, hasnt been confirmed.

if they was such an imminent threat, we should've found some of them. saddam wouldnt have been hiding them if they were supposed to be "imminent threats"

LutherMac 06-05-2003 07:22 AM

Personally, I thought for SURE we would find them days after the war was over... if not from Saddam.... then planted by the US government to prove that we were right...

But nothing has turned up so far... and SOMEONE would have stepped up and said something by now, I'm sure of that.

Liquor Dealer 06-05-2003 08:00 AM

I think they will be found. I am glad everyone is not as down on my country as you two are. I do not believe the US would ever plant something as you suggest. The two mobile lab trailers, the missiles, and tons of other evidence, plus Sadamm's glorious history point to their existence. I think if we really wanted to find them we could probably present them in a couple of hours - however, a couple of Iraq's neighbors would probably feel a bit invaded.

Simple_Min 06-05-2003 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Liquor Dealer
I think they will be found. I am glad everyone is not as down on my country as you two are. I do not believe the US would ever plant something as you suggest. The two mobile lab trailers, the missiles, and tons of other evidence, plus Sadamm's glorious history point to their existence.
I am no longer looking for just any WMD proof. I want this imminent threat that UK and the White house said existed. Where are the launch sites ready to attack Israel and the UK and the US? Surely they didn’t smuggle those to other places without the Wonderful American surveillance watching? We were under SERIOUS and REAL danger because of Saddam's ready arsenal.

It seems like if these WMD's did exist we are in greater danger AFTER the war than we were before. If they existed, now possibly are in the hands of people who have much less to lose by using them than did Saddam. Either way you look at it, War on terror isn't.

Quote:

I think if we really wanted to find them we could probably present them in a couple of hours - however, a couple of Iraq's neighbors would probably feel a bit invaded.
And then Iraq's neighbor's neighbors would feel invaded...iterate until the weapons are back to where they may have originated from: the u.s.

Saddam is gone. Glad! So hopefully next we will have a swift and well deserved regime change back in the US and we will have a more democratic elections than we did last.

Liquor Dealer 06-05-2003 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Simple_Min
................
And then Iraq's neighbor's neighbors would feel invaded...iterate until the weapons are back to where they may have originated from: the u.s.

Saddam is gone. Glad! So hopefully next we will have a swift and well deserved regime change back in the US and we will have a more democratic elections than we did last.

You probably will come a whole lot closer to finding them stamped Made in France - along with made in Germany, Russia, and N Korea. Your desire for a regime change in the US is several years away.

The quip on the neighbors being invaded - might be a lot closer than some of you seem to think.

Mr. Mojo 06-05-2003 08:46 AM

We dropped a lot of bombs, Spec-Ops were all over Iraq blowing shit up

Has it occurred to anyone that maybe we blew some of the weapons up so Saddam wouldn't be able to use them on invading US Troops? Just a theory

LutherMac 06-05-2003 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Liquor Dealer
I think they will be found. I am glad everyone is not as down on my country as you two are. I do not believe the US would ever plant something as you suggest.
Not down on the country at all... in fact, I was well in support of the war. I just seriously doubt that WMDs will actually be found on Iraqi soil anytime soon. The fact that we can't find anything only proves to me that we were just a little too late, and Saddam has shipped everything to his pals out in the Middle East.

We didn't go in there out of fear that he was personally going to use the weapons on us... we were afraid that he would actually give them out to whoever came to him with an plan to attack us. Now that we can't seem to find anything that exists, but rather we're finding that he had the means to create them... all probability does point to the fact that he's dispersed them to unknown groups.. now we've just got to find out who.

The reason I thought for sure that we'd plant it... personally, just seems like something we'd have done because we could. However, in recent weeks I've realized why that hasn't been done. If we DID plant anything... and were caught... well.. lets just say we'd piss quite a few groups off.

Still... whatever was there is now gone. You're completely correct in the fact that we'll have to check his neighbors if we really want to find anything.

splck 06-05-2003 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LutherMac
Personally, I thought for SURE we would find them days after the war was over... if not from Saddam.... then planted by the US government to prove that we were right...

But nothing has turned up so far... and SOMEONE would have stepped up and said something by now, I'm sure of that.

If they don't find them, I wouldn't put it past them to "plant" some to help justify the cause.
Governments never lie:rolleyes:

Liquor Dealer 06-05-2003 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by splck
If they don't find them, I wouldn't put it past them to "plant" some to help justify the cause.
Governments never lie:rolleyes:

I wouldn't make a damn bit of difference if we found a train load of the shit - we're going to be accused of planting it no matter what is found.

Mr. Mojo 06-05-2003 09:11 AM

The Sheep have spoken...

<a target=new href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr030604.asp"><b> Little Concern About Lack of WMD in Iraq.</b> Public rejects charges of deliberate deception by Bush administration (Link)</a>

By 67% to 31%, Americans say the Bush administration did not deliberately mislead the American public about whether Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

Overall, 62% of Americans now believe the information was inaccurate, but half of that group (31%) says the Bush administration thought the information was correct. The other half believes the Bush administration knew it was incorrect. Another 31% believe the original information provided by the Bush administration was correct.

Simple_Min 06-05-2003 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Liquor Dealer
You probably will come a whole lot closer to finding them stamped Made in France - along with made in Germany, Russia, and N Korea. Your desire for a regime change in the US is several years away.

The quip on the neighbors being invaded - might be a lot closer than some of you seem to think.

Of course. Right. France. And I suppose the unlisted nation (the US) has a cleaner record than the countries you are so quick to criticize. Double Standard?

Perhaps it's you who is being a bit naive in thinking America will invade other countries in the region. That invasion may get us 2 steps closer to whatever it is we are trying to achieve, but everything else will take 3 steps backward.

Daval 06-05-2003 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr. Mojo
We dropped a lot of bombs, Spec-Ops were all over Iraq blowing shit up

Has it occurred to anyone that maybe we blew some of the weapons up so Saddam wouldn't be able to use them on invading US Troops? Just a theory


Look at the 'Deceptions' thread posted on this board. The US claimed to know exactly where this stuff was located. Surely they would have saved some to wave in front of the faces of us unbelievers.

Bollocks to that.

Maybe WMD do exist in Iraq, but the fact remains that the US manipulated countries, manipulated facts, tried to manipulate the UN to get what they wanted. And now they don't have the proof to back up their claims.

Hell, rumour has it that Colin Powell was extremely uncomfortable with what he had to base his case on.

Simple_Min 06-05-2003 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Daval

Hell, rumour has it that Colin Powell was extremely uncomfortable with what he had to base his case on.

:D

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/0...ws/9intell.htm

Quote:

On the evening of February 1, two dozen American officials gathered in a spacious conference room at the Central Intelligence Agency in Langley, Va. The time had come to make the public case for war against Iraq. For six hours that Saturday, the men and women of the Bush administration argued about what Secretary of State Colin Powell should--and should not--say at the United Nations Security Council four days later. Not all the secret intelligence about Saddam Hussein's misdeeds, they found, stood up to close scrutiny. At one point during the rehearsal, Powell tossed several pages in the air. "I'm not reading this," he declared. "This is bulls- - -."

Daval 06-05-2003 10:27 AM

thanks for the quote simple_min

Charlatan 06-05-2003 10:46 AM

At this late a date I don't think it matters anymore whether or not the US finds any WMD.

The US controls Iraq. They control the oil. They control the election process. They will have their vassal state.

Daval 06-05-2003 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Charlatan
At this late a date I don't think it matters anymore whether or not the US finds any WMD.

The US controls Iraq. They control the oil. They control the election process. They will have their vassal state.



I sure wish it would cost bush the election though.

The_Dude 06-05-2003 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr. Mojo
The Sheep have spoken...

<a target=new href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr030604.asp"><b> Little Concern About Lack of WMD in Iraq.</b> Public rejects charges of deliberate deception by Bush administration (Link)</a>

By 67% to 31%, Americans say the Bush administration did not deliberately mislead the American public about whether Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

Overall, 62% of Americans now believe the information was inaccurate, but half of that group (31%) says the Bush administration thought the information was correct. The other half believes the Bush administration knew it was incorrect. Another 31% believe the original information provided by the Bush administration was correct.

so, 31% of americans believe that that US intelligence is not the best in the world? and US intelligence could screw up on something of this magnitude?

Liquor Dealer 06-05-2003 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The_Dude
so, 31% of americans believe that that US intelligence is not the best in the world? and US intelligence could screw up on something of this magnitude?
So! If we continue with this logic I assume that 69% think it is the best in the world! That's pretty good! Don't ya' think!!!

4thTimeLucky 06-05-2003 12:52 PM

currently 10 to 4 against.

i thought you guys were all a bit more pro-the-party-line than that.

The_Dude 06-05-2003 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Liquor Dealer
So! If we continue with this logic I assume that 69% think it is the best in the world! That's pretty good! Don't ya' think!!!
definately

Macheath 06-05-2003 01:23 PM

They'll find them shortly before the next US Presidential election.

geep 06-05-2003 01:23 PM

I'd like to get on this one. Make it 10 to 5. Who cares if we ever find anything. We know he had 'em cause he used 'em against the Kurds and the Iranians. We know he had ties to terrorists, they built extensive training facilities in his country. Whether the threat was imminent or not is not the point. Does anybody think that the eventuality that terrorists would end up with WMD's from Iraq didn't exist? Maybe not tommorrow or the next day but it sure looked absolute. What were we gonna do to stop it? Make Saddam promise not to give terrorists the bomb? Maybe the Bush administration told us the truth or maybe they didn't. One thing we know is that something that looked like a sure bet doesn't look so sure now. I'm happy about that. That would be justification enough for me. Maybe the American public is just too niave to look at the facts.

door 06-05-2003 01:39 PM

*sigh*

If I gave you 100 people and asked you to search the entire state of california for a lab or box the size of an apartment, probobly deep underground, that I had 5 years to hide, how long would it take you to find?

and the clear and immediate danger was not that they can launch them, but that they can give them to terrorists.

I am sick and tired of all of this nonsense, because, frankly, thats all it is. If bush is a liar, so is the UN, and the clinton administration, because all of these groups said they had them.

and if it was all about oil, how come we're still paying for it? How come the UK and the US isn't just taking it and shipping it home? How come we arn't dictating price?

People during the clinton administration had nothing but true things to say negativly about the administration because so much crap was actually going on. But now that the Liberals are on the wrong side of history and have been wrong so many times, they are trying anything to get the Pres. and the rest of the conservatives.

It is pathetic.

The_Dude 06-05-2003 02:00 PM

we're not arguing liberal vs conservative here, we're just debating whether or not we'll find WMD's in iraq

smooth 06-05-2003 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by door
*sigh*

If I gave you 100 people and asked you to search the entire state of california for a lab or box the size of an apartment, probobly deep underground, that I had 5 years to hide, how long would it take you to find?

and if it was all about oil, how come we're still paying for it? How come the UK and the US isn't just taking it and shipping it home? How come we arn't dictating price?

It is pathetic.

Your first point is the same one the other side was saying in support of further inspections. What changed between now and then? And why won't the administration allow the UN inspectors to return?

You do realize how much the cost of gasoline has decreased since before we went to war, right? Part of that was a result of the "shortness" of the war--OPEC has more crude than the market requires. Now they also have to reintegrate Iraq production into their quota--effectively altering the structure of the cartel's price controls.

Mr. Mojo 06-05-2003 03:27 PM

If i may quote Tony Blankley - its a really interesting column
<a target=new href="http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20030603-084017-7635r.htm"><b>George 'Machiavelli' Bush? Nah</b></a>

We are now to believe that the president is the devious mastermind of a mind-bogglingly complex plot to deceive the world into thinking Saddam Hussein had chemical and biological weapons. Not only did he have to deceive the credulous and naive French Intelligence Service, but also Russian and German intelligence, the U.N. Security Council and their inspectors, the State Department bureaucracy, including Colin Powell personally, and Tony Blair and the vaunted British Intelligence establishment. Because before the war, all those entities honestly believed — and consistently reported to the world press — that they believed Saddam had such weapons.

Let's be clear what the news media and political charge is against President Bush: He "hyped" the facts; he politicized classified intelligence; he misled the world, he stated facts he had reason to know weren't true. To have accomplished such a thing, he didn't have to merely fool a gullible public, he also had to fool his own government bureaucracy, because in Washington a classified government secret is the common knowledge of every 27-year-old cable news producer by about 11 a.m. Remember, last August field-grade officers were leaking Pentagon war plans to the New York Times and The Washington Post on a regular basis? If these same war-averse men had possessed information to contradict President Bush over the last six months, when he was talking about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, does any one doubt they would have leaked such information before their morning coffee breaks? To have accomplished both such manipulation of his government and of world opinion would seem inconsistent with the media's portrayal of him as a Forrest Gump type. Now, they would have us see George Bush as possessing all the skills and instincts of Nicoli Machiavelli and Joseph Goebbels.

In 1998, President Clinton called for, and Congress passed into law, the official U.S. government policy on Iraq: Regime change due to their possession of weapons of mass destruction...

The real question the world should be asking is not why Mr. Bush went to war, but why Saddam did. For what was Saddam willing to risk his regime and life? Consider, up to the moment of the war, if he had agreed to cooperate with the U.N. weapons inspectors, war could have been avoided. .
That Saddam chose to fight, answers all rational questions. But even now, a deranged world and a Bush-hating Democratic Party (and their media auxiliary) insist on putting our good president in the dock, rather than the evil Saddam — the greatest killer of Muslims in history."

<a target=new href="http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9802/17/iraq.clinton/">(CNN: Clinton demands total access for U.N. arms inspectors -02.17.98)</a>
<a target=new href="http://www.cnn.com/US/9812/16/clinton.iraq.speech/">(CNN: Clinton Speech - Iraq has Abused its Last Chance -12.16.98)</a>
<a target=new href="http://www.cnn.com/US/9812/16/clinton.iraq.speech/#2">(CNN: Clinton - Strikes Necessary to Stunt Weapons Programs -12.16.98)</a>

Liquor Dealer 06-05-2003 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The_Dude
we're not arguing liberal vs conservative here, we're just debating whether or not we'll find WMD's in iraq
What else would you call it? Liberals say everything George Bush says or does is a lie - Conservatives say everything the liberals say or do is a damn lie. Things simply haven't worked out to suit you guys. Better luck next time.

reconmike 06-05-2003 07:03 PM

They are there, and as soon as they confirm those tiny bone fragments they have from under that building Hussien was hiding in the hiders will come out of the woodwork for the US cash.

The rush to get attack was also due to the fact that summer was coming, shithole desert in summertime, not ideal for combat.

They have found mobile bio labs. Which could culture bio-toxins.

And does anyone know how long it takes to produce sarin gas?

mingster 06-05-2003 08:30 PM

Possible, but unlikely. We've been interogating all their top scientists for the last few weeks, you'd think someone would have cracked by now. There's always the possibility, but considering that the US has to be offering a ridiculous amount of incentives to anyone who gives them conclusive proof I find it doubtful.

eyeronic 06-05-2003 11:13 PM

Not that I don't believe they ever existed, but I think due to the martyr mindset of S.H., he did everything possible to make them dissappear.

Sun Tzu 06-06-2003 01:16 AM

The way I see it is they will continue to look, for security reasons. I feel they will continue to look even if it takes years to do. Is there anyone that would prefer the US troops stop looking for them?
THe reason I dont believe they would be planted by the US is this: who do you think the US is trying to impress? Its own citizens? The rest of the world? What if they never did find any...? And. . . Whos going to get spanked and who's doing the spanking?

Just a thought.

KillerYoda 06-06-2003 01:39 AM

They seem to really be reaching for it lately, so I don't think they will. When they start saying that an abandoned trailer "could have" been used for chemical weapons, they're running out of places to look. Using a "dirty" trailer as reason for the invasion of Iraq would be a like using a dollar bill with traces of cocaine on it as the main evidence in a drug trafficking trial.

seretogis 06-06-2003 01:40 AM

Considering that only 1% (if that, I can't remember exactly) of the suspected WMD storage locations have been searched yet, I wouldn't put all of my eggs in one basket. It's way too early to determine the outcome of the search.

Simple_Min 06-06-2003 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Macheath
They'll find them shortly before the next US Presidential election.
I second that.

Sparhawk 06-06-2003 06:01 AM

Don't you remember, the president said we've already found the weapons of mass destruction. Because two empty abandoned trailers, those are weapons of mass destruction.

I feel lately like America has the memory of a goldfish.

geep 06-06-2003 06:18 AM

Give it a rest guys. I grew up hiding under a desk at school because the Soviets where gonna launch the big one. The kids today are gonna grow up believing every time they go to the airport they're getting in a missle. The enemy is terrorism and unlike the Soviet Union it's a little harder to see it plainly. We'll never know if WMD's would ever have gotten into terrorist hands from Saddam's arsenal. No one can honestly deny they existed in Iraq. Quit trying to make the U.S. the enemy. If they find WMDs in Iraq- good for them. If they don't- quit wasting valuable time and resources declaring evil deeds on the Administration's part and start looking for the next source of danger to the worlds well being.

The_Dude 06-06-2003 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Macheath
They'll find them shortly before the next US Presidential election.
i wouldnt be surprised if they did.

and then, bush is going to visit the country, congratulate the troops.

james t kirk 06-08-2003 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by door
*sigh*

If I gave you 100 people and asked you to search the entire state of california for a lab or box the size of an apartment, probobly deep underground, that I had 5 years to hide, how long would it take you to find?

Umm, there are thousands of people over there.

And, the big argument is that saddam and co. were manufacturing chemical and biological weapons. If that is the case, you need some pretty sophisticated labs that are none too easy to hide. Especially in a country like Iraq.


Quote:

Originally posted by door
*and if it was all about oil, how come we're still paying for it? How come the UK and the US isn't just taking it and shipping it home? How come we arn't dictating price?

I hope you are kidding right.

No-one ever said you were going to get free oil.

The American oil companies are going to get a cheap source of oil and sell it to you at the highest price the market will bear.

All the average american will get is a big tax bill to pay for the war to secure the oil wells for the fat cats who run the oil companies. (That's why the average american family share of the American debt now stands at a paulty $102,000.00 for each and every household in the Untited States.) How do you like that one?

Don't believe me re the debt nightmare you all are facing?

check it out, it plays in Times Square live (I was just there)

http://www.toptips.com/debtclock.html

hotzot 06-08-2003 10:36 PM

I wish they would hurry up and plant the WMD. This story is so old!

chodarama 06-09-2003 06:44 AM

Yes, because we will put them there for finding.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360