| Redjake |
04-18-2004 07:47 AM |
Quote:
Originally posted by Jesus Pimp
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
28 Days Later is not a zombie movie. The people in movie were infected but by no means zombies. Just because they're cannibals doesn't mean they are zombies. I swear I'm going to smack the next person who says 28 Days Later is a zombie flick :lol:
Sam Raimi never invented a generic zombie cam. Where did you get your camera terms from? Sam invented the Vas-O-Cam, the Shakey Cam, the Ellie-Vator, and the Ram-O-Cam. Sam Raimi never made any zombie films. The Deadites in the Evil Dead films aren't zombies either, they're demon possessed people. Wow oh wow I'll just stop there.. :lol
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
|
aaaahhh brat attack!!!
seriously though, who cares. zombies, pissed off humans, who cares. you missed my point. if it bothers you that much, replace any time I said "zombie" with "humans that are pissed off and want to eat you." my point remains the same.
also, you can't tell me that Evil Dead 2 didn't have the awesome zombie-cam. and no, that's not a ® after the zombie-cam. I made it up. not really sure where you got ellie-vator, shaky cam, ram cam, or whatever the hell you were talking about, but the zombie-cam I am talking about is a term out of my imagination. stop looking into it so much :)
any human that is raging and wants to fucking eat me is a zombie in my opinion.
but seriously, re-read my post, and do what I mentioned above so you can wade through it if it's that bad. the movie could have been so good. but the last 1/3 just seriously sucked. |
