Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   the dreaded marijuana thread (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/869-dreaded-marijuana-thread.html)

Fly 04-20-2003 06:48 AM

the dreaded marijuana thread
 
legalize or de-criminalize?

no flamin' please,but all are welcome to express their take on it.

i say de-crim.just so you don't end up in the slammer for a damn doobie.

pay a fine......send the pot head on his way.

ICER 04-20-2003 06:50 AM

Ok, I don't smoke it, never have, But my sister did it allot growing up. so I do have comments on it.

Legal for medical causes...YES

Legal for public use............NO

eyeronic 04-20-2003 06:51 AM

The threaded marijuana dread? Huh... Oh yeah dude... Decriminalize is right on man.

Seriously though. Blue laws suck. Vancouver does it right!

frozenstellar 04-20-2003 06:53 AM

despite the fact that i smoke it occasioanlly, i'd say leave the laws as it is, and not decriminalize it. i just dont see why it should be.

sixate 04-20-2003 06:54 AM

I knew that someone would have to bring this back.

phunktastic 04-20-2003 06:55 AM

Give it the same kind of regulations as tobacco and alcohol

BoCo 04-20-2003 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by phunktastic
Give it the same kind of regulations as tobacco and alcohol
I agree.

However, being a pothead should still be illegal (I forget who said that originally).

genka 04-20-2003 07:06 AM

Make it illiagal to sell it, unless you're the goverment, then legalise it, but with crazy penalaties for mis-use (driving under influence, if you commit the crime while high, more jail time, ect.) One step closer to communism, and good-bye to most pot-related crime. No-one's gonna buy illeagal pot if they can get it leagaly. Also, good-bye to nat'l debt.

Fly 04-20-2003 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sixate
I knew that someone would have to bring this back.
sorry dude.had to do it.i wanna hear what everyones take is.:D

Grondar 04-20-2003 07:23 AM

I think it should be legalized, but regulated.

Interesting side-note. In my speech class in college I was part of a debate and my partner and I took the "Don't legalize" side. The "winner" of the debate was determined by a class vote.

Needless to say, my group lost. :)

Fob_Magi 04-20-2003 07:37 AM

I think at the least it should be moved off the schedule I controlled drug list.. along with X...

but I think it needs to be decriminalized for personal/medical use.. our governemt spends way to much money every year fighting weed usage when they cant even fucking stop coke/crack and heroin... and the meth problem in this country is increasing dramatically every year...

Not to mention it's no more dangerous or addictive than alchol..

Mad_Gecko 04-20-2003 07:43 AM

Decriminalise and sell in licensed shops with heavy taxation.
Possesion of small amounts should be legal, <1oz.

Agree with Genka about the penalties for DUI.

ARTelevision 04-20-2003 08:00 AM

Too bad it destroys so much of one's mind and our social fabric.

Might as well regulate it heavily, tax it and penalize unregulated use.

John Henry 04-20-2003 09:32 AM

I used to do it, but I gave up because it was fucking me up. I know of people who carried on, because they could handle it. I think that's a good argument in favour of informed choice.

I say partially legalize it , but keep it independent. If you fully legalise it, all the big corporations will start producing it by slave labour and make it more harmful by filling it with hormones and shit. Make it legal to grow and possess, but not to sell, keeping the dealers small and leaving more prison space for rapists, murderers and racist LA cops.

pseudopsycho 04-20-2003 09:43 AM

people wpuld still buy illegally simply because the govt will tax the bejesus out of it if they were to legalize it. I say it should be legalized though simply because everytime I spark a J or smoke a bowl I shouldn't have to worry about the damn po-po rolling up on me and taking my ass to jail. Pot is fun and it doesn't really hurt anyone so I don't see what the big goddamn deal about it is. But that is just the opinion of a pothead.

Nhanced1 04-20-2003 09:53 AM

As a person who has only done it twice in his entire life, I say decriminalize. Its totally unfair to lock someone up just for having one or two joints on them.

yournamehere 04-20-2003 09:53 AM

Re: the dreaded marijuana thread
 
Quote:

Originally posted by flyman

i say de-crim.just so you don't end up in the slammer for a damn doobie.

pay a fine......send the pot head on his way.

I see two problems with that, <b>Flyman</b>:

1. Just by the way you said it - <i>send the pot head on his way</i>, you're acknowledging that you don't see a problem with people smoking pot. In that case, why not just make it legal?

2. By assigning a "Get out of jail by paying a fine" option, you're polarizing the legal effect of getting caught between the haves and have-nots of society. In other words, just send the poor kids to jail - but if Mommy and Daddy can pay the fine, the kid can walk.

b1m2x3 04-20-2003 09:57 AM

this will go for all of america if it is legalized:
"Them damned smoked themselves ratarded!"
i doubt we have enough self control, seeing all of the teenages who are already abusing it now......

i say, keep it illegal

sciontic 04-20-2003 10:10 AM

legalize it, and all other recreational drugs.

put all those damn dealers outta buisness and let us get high in peace.

X and weed are like the best drugs out, noone causes any trouble when they on these.

when was the last time u got beaten up by a pot/pill head?

only drunk idiots do crap like that.

frenik 04-20-2003 10:11 AM

A popular opinion seems to be (not from this board, just from discussions I've had in person with friends) that if we legalize, all of America will turn into potheads, the economy will tumble because people are showing up high and giggling their way through the day.

We could have said the same thing about alcohol during prohibition. That if we re-legalized it, America would go to hell. People would show up to work drunk all the time, American society would drown itself in booze. This didn't happen, and I doubt it would with marijuana.

Marijuana is still an intoxicant, and would be treated as such. If you showed up to work high, you're fired. Simple as that. Just because it's legalized, doesn't mean bosses will just ignore it and everyone will turn into potheads.

I think marijuana should be legalized, the same way tobacco is. The only problem is that the government can't really make money on taxes with it, because it is so easy to grow. The stuff literally grows like weeds. The government would have to make growing it without a license illegal, in order to make taxing it profitable.

"Experts" say it's a gateway drug, but if we get rid of the dealers that removes most of the problem. If it becomes too expensive, the dealers will still sell their stuff cheaper and the problem will not go away.

Marijuana is a complex issue, but I don't see why it should not be legalized in the same vein as tobacco and alcohol.

GuttersnipeXL 04-20-2003 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sciontic
legalize it, and all other recreational drugs.

put all those damn dealers outta buisness and let us get high in peace.

X and weed are like the best drugs out, noone causes any trouble when they on these.

when was the last time u got beaten up by a pot/pill head?

only drunk idiots do crap like that.


Let me tell ya something about "x". One of my best friends died on that shit, because some effin shadey piece of shit rave kid cut his shit with heroin...I don't condone the use of it and will never do it. So you can't really say that it doesn't cause any trouble.

As far as weed goes, decriminalize it and mind your own business, simple as that.

snowy 04-20-2003 11:45 AM

legalized but regulated

butthead 04-20-2003 02:02 PM

Quote:

Too bad it destroys so much of one's mind and our social fabric.
Hmm, like those fully legal substances tobacco and ethanol? You need to prove that it "destroys so much of one's mind" and also do well for social fabric. Bummer not everything can be peachy keen, but it doesn't justify prohibition, if anyone's thinking that.

Quote:

i doubt we have enough self control, seeing all of the teenages who are already abusing it now......
How does this justify prohibition? You're afraid that if it is legalized, pot-use will grow out of control? Drug abuse will always be around with recreational drugs, but last I checked, it was easier for a teen to get a bag of weed than a packet of cigarettes. I don't doubt an inititial increase in the numbers of marijuana-use reports, but I think it would likely be amongst adults and would have an overall positive effect on society. I think marijuana should have minimum age restrictions, perhaps around 16. I think 16 would be the most effective at reducing underaged pot smoking. I do think we should do _something_ to present obstacles to underaged drug use, but straight out illegalizing substances will have the opposite effect, I think.

Quote:

One of my best friends died on that shit, because some effin shadey piece of shit rave kid cut his shit with heroin
All right, I'm only aware of one pill on ecstasydata that recently tested positive for heroin and a lethal heroin dose would be much more than what is likely to be found in a pill. Your friend probably died because of other reasons, but MDMA has been extremely safe in therapeutic settings with professional supervision.

I say it should be legal. The basis for the prohibition of marijuana is racist and the substance itself is incredibly safe and less addictive than tobacco and ethanol.

-zzzzzz

GuttersnipeXL 04-20-2003 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by butthead


All right, I'm only aware of one pill on ecstasydata that recently tested positive for heroin and a lethal heroin overdose would be much more than what is likely to be found in a pill. Your friend probably died because of other reasons, but MDMA has been extremely safe in therapeutic settings with professional supervision.


OK I don't want to start any shit with anyone, but here is the deal...The kid ate 3 pills from the same dude....he never did heroin in his lifetime...when the autopsy results came back...there was traces of heroin in his system. He wasn't drinking on it or doing any other kind of drugs. The mix of the two...ecstasy and heroin...killed him. What I'm trying to say is, you've got to be a scientist to know whats inside that shit, or have access to one of those test kits.

Johnny Rotten 04-20-2003 02:14 PM

Hell, sounds like a good way to kickstart the economy at this point. Regulated like alcohol, though.

butthead 04-20-2003 02:28 PM

Quote:

The kid ate 3 pills from the same dude
Too bad not many people send in pills for analysis. The Ecstasy market is really fucked up.

I'm not really going to get much further into the Ecstasy thing (unless someone wants to start up a thread about that), as it would be hijacking the thread, but assuming the kid did die from heroin, it still doesn't justify why MDMA is "bad".

Even the test kits won't tell you everything. :(

LordEden 04-20-2003 03:24 PM

Weed is just a plant, never in history has killed anyone, nor made anyone go insane and start shooting up post offices. Herion, X, Coke, barbituaties, LSD, Shrooms, none of those should be legal, I think they should legalize weed, tax the hell out of it (even with taxes it still wouldn't touch street prices $350-400 an oz is kicking my ass and my wallet) and get out country out of debt. Less people in jail, less stress on the legal system, and profits would be astronomical.
Let the Weed Be Free.
LE

Jack Ruby 04-20-2003 03:42 PM

Here in Belgium we have a law that says you can smoke it, provided you are over 18, and don't smoke in public or around any minors. You're allowed to carry 5 grams on you, but you're not allowed to sell it.

We'll probably move on to the Dutch system in a while - where it can be sold and bought legally in certain designated "coffee shops". Which is fine by me, I wouldn't want it being sold everywhere and to everyone.

splck 04-20-2003 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by GuttersnipeXL
Let me tell ya something about "x". One of my best friends died on that shit, because some effin shadey piece of shit rave kid cut his shit with heroin...I don't condone the use of it and will never do it. So you can't really say that it doesn't cause any trouble.

Sorry about your friend, yet another victim of the war on drugs. If it was legal you wouldn't have shit like this happening.

Back to weed. I'm in favor of de-criminalizing or full legalizing. Making criminals out of pot users is over the top. I have no problem giving out fines for possesion, but locking someone away won't solve anything.
I don't think legalizing will happen in my life, but it will be de-crim soon in Canada, and that is all I care about:D

Gotenks 04-20-2003 04:08 PM

Now I know I should of read all posts to make sure my comment isnt already said, but I feel very strongly towards the idea of legalizing marijuana. This indeed is a hard statement to back-up as are most drugs to back up. But I do indeed smoke so my opinion is extreemly biased.

1: I've found that smoking helps me relax most nights (I have a chronic anxiety etc etc, not gunna get into it). And sleeping is a big issue for me.

a: Without weed It takes normally 3-4 hours of lying down until I finally clear my brain of questions that are keeping me up.
b: With weed it SEEMS (seems being a key word because i'm not completely certain), that I do indeed sleep faster.

2: Weed slows down your time frame. Now this can lead to good AND bad things.

a: Being able to get the most out of your day.
b: Short attention span.

3: Weed disorients you. This can lead to switching projects to be done fast without finishing, or having a fun time because you really worry about nothing. This is one of the main reasons why it is illegal, because it changes the way your interpret things, which when driving could completely screw your perception.

4: Dry mouth. Don't see how much this could affect every day life. Maybe you drink a bit more, maybe this is the cure to not having enough vitamens (that is only if you keep orange juice and other juices in your house, forcing you to only drink good stuff.)

5: Munchies. Again as above this could also be to your benefit only if you keep healthy food in your house, noone has ever actually tried this, might be worth a try though =).


I could think of more, but again I'm not looking at it the way an anti-marijuana person would, so again these statements are from what my brain is telling me to say, and in no way are any of these 100% true.

-Gotenks

ARTelevision 04-20-2003 04:11 PM

After these things have been said, we'll need to help those folks who were destroyed by this supposedly harmless drug.
There is more damage to self and society than anyone who defends its use is able to imagine.

redrum 04-20-2003 04:27 PM

I smoke pot on a regular basis. I also hold down a job, and have a normal social life. It hasn't lead me to harder drugs, wreck My car or get 14 year olds pregnant..Like the commercials recently point out.

Alcohol is much harder to give up cold turkey, it does cause more accidents, deaths and social misbehavior. Im not saying legalize it. I just think the TV world should stop flinging mud.

People dont die from over dosing on weed, they die from jackasses cutting it with harder drugs. Ive never smoked a joint and thought I could fly.

butthead 04-20-2003 04:35 PM

Quote:

we'll need to help those folks who were destroyed by this supposedly harmless drug
No one is saying it's harmless. And also, this STILL does not justify marijuana prohibition.

Quote:

There is more damage to self and society than anyone who defends its use is able to imagine.
Yeah, well, you've yet to prove anything.

Quote:

Alcohol is much harder to give up cold turkey
Yeah, definitely, considering the possible seizures or possible death.

There are risks with marijuana use, minimal as they may be, but they do not justify legalization.

redrum 04-20-2003 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by butthead
No one is saying it's harmless. And also, this STILL does not justify marijuana prohibition.



Yeah, well, you've yet to prove anything.



Yeah, definitely, considering the possible seizures or possible death.

There are risks with marijuana use, minimal as they may be, but they do not justify legalization.

dont para-quote me :(

Im not saying legalize it. I just think the TV world should stop flinging mud.

was my point

butthead 04-20-2003 04:46 PM

I wasn't responding to that.

TaLoN 04-20-2003 05:00 PM

marijuana is no more dangerous/harmful than a pencil. you can use a pencil to stab someone in the neck just as easily as smoking pot and getting into a car accident. if someone's life is fucked up because of pot then it is their own damn fault

ARTelevision 04-20-2003 05:03 PM

butthead
I've said my piece on this subject.
I wish you the best.

phoenix1002 04-20-2003 05:39 PM

I'm definitely with ART on this one...
Anything that distorts your senses can potentially be hazardous. Just because alcohol and cigarettes are legal does not justify the legalization of marijuana.

People seem to think that if marijuana was legal, then everyone would be happy, the pot would be cheaper, and there would be less of a problem with it than there is now. I don't think that would be the case. If it was legal, then I suspect more people would try it. It might be cheaper, but that again would lead more people to smoke it. I've had to work with some people who were stoned in class, and it isn't fun. I don't see how any good can come of legalizing marijuana, except maybe making it safer for those using it. Not worth it in my opinion.

degrawj 04-20-2003 05:42 PM

decriminalize it. if you don't want to smoke it, and hate it, that's fine. then don't smoke it. but some people out there do use it responsibly, and the punishment right now is way to severe.

gibber71 04-20-2003 05:51 PM

I say smoke it if you got it.By the time the government get's there hands on it,they'll fuck things up so bad we'll all wish they didn't do anything(de-crim that is).Nothing will change.

Fly 04-20-2003 05:51 PM

making pot legal is not the way to go.

if it is de-criminalized though,then all i'm saying is for those of "us" that enjoy a joint,we can have a hoot or two without going to jail.

we can grow our own "personel" pot and take the selling off the streets in that manner.

couple plants in the back forty,no harm to anyone and you don't have to go to joe maggott on the street corner.

de-criminalize

butthead 04-20-2003 07:04 PM

Quote:

Anything that distorts your senses can potentially be hazardous. Just because alcohol and cigarettes are legal does not justify the legalization of marijuana.
You bet it does. If marijuana is a schedule one substance, alcohol and cigarettes must be too. According to the Controlled Substances Act, a schedule one substance is something that has high abuse potential, has no medicinal value, and has a lack of safety under medical supervision.

And finally, I've yet to see anything in this thread that justifies anything but full on legalization.

Quote:

Anything that distorts your senses can potentially be hazardous.
Driving is hazardous. Walking around on the stress presents risks too.

-zzzzzz

butthead 04-20-2003 07:05 PM

Quote:

making pot legal is not the way to
Why not?

HiThereDear 04-20-2003 07:15 PM

Listen, just because your sister or someone you know was a dumbass pothead doesn't mean the rest of us should suffer. I smoke regularly and I have a 3.83 gpa, I get along wonderfully with my family, I'm happy, and alcohol got me into more trouble than smoking weed ever has.

cdwonderful 04-20-2003 07:17 PM

decrim no doubt

WhoaitsZ 04-20-2003 07:41 PM

um first off im kinda breaking a rule. i'm not reading the other posts and will likely not read any further, BUT i wanted to throw my opinion in.

I have seen people do terribly stupid shit. i had a friend who's 8balled weekend after weekend, i know people who use to do valiums like candy, i myself had a life destroying addiction with a pain killer. almost all of america is addicted to mcdonalds or Really Bad Shit and they drink coffee by the barrel fulls

so..... marijuana, compared to all of the above if used by a water bong is HARMLESS.

i don't do pot.. i don't do anything but occasional booze. it's just not me. a personal decision. BUT i believe people SHOULD use pot more... it would possibly reduce use of other, much more lethal drugs.

if i had a child who said 'pick my poison, dad. obesity, alcoholism, freebasing, heroine, speed, or pot' i would probably BUY their pot and thank Jesus they arn't doing something rediculously harmful.

pot is a-okay. you don't smoke and drive but that's common sense... something the us lost years ago.

legalize it. quit puting harmless people in jail cuz they wanna relax. go for the ceos who assbang their employees and the baby murders!

(whoa)

blkdmnd 04-20-2003 07:45 PM

I kind of go both ways on this. I don't know if we need another drug or substance to impair judgement and make driving worse. Inhibitions get lowered and ambivalence increases and these may not be the best things.

That said, I think it sucks for someone to get busted for a small amount of pot. If we make it legal, the govt can tax it. Of course, it would probably be more consistent quality too.

I think I vote for decriminalize.

WhoaitsZ 04-20-2003 07:47 PM

oh yeah. remember . every single person is different. we all have vices andd we all deal differently. some people can occasionally snort coke and you'd never know. some people can down one beer and be s t u p i d. so do _not_ stereotype, people. that's just lame.

phoenix1002 04-20-2003 07:54 PM

Quote: "You bet it does. If marijuana is a schedule one substance, alcohol and cigarettes must be too. According to the Controlled Substances Act, a schedule one substance is something that has high abuse potential, has no medicinal value, and has a lack of safety under medical supervision. "

Then by your own logic, lets make alcohol and cigarettes illegal too. Most people here seem to agree that they're more dangerous anyway.

Quote: "Anything that distorts your senses can potentially be hazardous.

Driving is hazardous. Walking around on the stress presents risks too"

This I wasn't clear enough about, and I think you misinterpreted. I know there are other things out there that are more dangerous. I'm probably more likely to get hurt or killed rock climbing or kayaking, too. I was just disagreeing with those who said that marijuana "never hurt anyone".

bundy 04-20-2003 07:59 PM

legalise it, then commercialise it.

butthead 04-20-2003 08:21 PM

Quote:

Then by your own logic, lets make alcohol and cigarettes illegal too. Most people here seem to agree that they're more dangerous anyway.
No, by the CSA, marijuana wouldn't be placed in schedule one.

Stinky Pee 04-20-2003 08:48 PM

I like the pot sometimes, but I think.....................

K-Billy 04-20-2003 08:56 PM

Leave it the way it is. The government will just tax the hell outta it and find other ways to make it bad.

Fly 04-20-2003 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by butthead
Why not?
well.... cuz i grow my own.

no need for the dirtbag on the street.

if it's legal then i could go to jail for growin' my own.

i just wanna be able to smoke one without the risk of doing time.

de-criminalize

Strawberry69666 04-20-2003 09:08 PM

Doesn't smoking do the same things as alcohol? Makes you dilirious? Makes bad choices? Why have one and not the other? I have smoked pot....but pot can make other effects to different people. ..like alcohol. Unlike the normal high you hear...I got paranoyed. I f*cking freaked. I really though I was going to die that night. But, I think there is no reason to not let people do what they want. I do agree that is would be controled in some way...but hey? Why not?

darksparkles 04-20-2003 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by phunktastic
Give it the same kind of regulations as tobacco and alcohol
agreed.

World's King 04-20-2003 10:50 PM

Dude, Where's My Car?

Phaenx 04-20-2003 11:08 PM

Keep that garbage criminalized.

alpha phi 04-21-2003 05:16 AM

I say decriminalize

There is no reason a pot head should spend a lifetime in prision for smokeing dope!
Here in Michigan anything over 650gms. is a manditory life sentance, about a pound and a half?
And yes,!??! if you're growing the cops weigh the soil!!!!!!!!!!!
Murder 7 years
Rape 3 years
molestation 6 months to 5 years
One pot plant ....LIFE
Somethings wrong here

I don't want to see it leagleized
because big buisness will run it like tobacco or alcohol

Peetster 04-21-2003 05:30 AM

Here we go.

I'm very opposed to "victimless crimes". Decrim at a minimum.

CSflim 04-21-2003 06:30 AM

Most people who have strong views on the decriminalisation of cannabis are (unsurprisingly enough) those people who actually smoke the stuff regularly.

I have never smoked it, and never will, but at the same time, I strongly believe it should be decriminalised. People should be allowed do what they want, as long as they're not hurting others.

They should be allowed to make up their own mind on whether or not they want to smoke that stuff, and with that they must accept to take the risks that come with it...i.e. no suing a big multinational hash producer years from now, because you're brain has shrivelled up due to twelve years of non stop smoking their product.

To me, the effects of alcohol abuse are far worse than that of cannabis. I mean how often do you hear of stoners walking the streets, picking fights with random people? How many often do people end up in the emergency room of a hospital due to a dope fuelled stabbing? To me, alcohol is a much bigger problem, yet it is perfectly legal.

I believe that cannabis should be legalised, but strictly controlled.

-C.S. Flim

butthead 04-21-2003 08:52 AM

Quote:

I'm very opposed to "victimless crimes".
Is this the only reason you're for prohibition?

ronan 04-21-2003 10:51 AM

ok... i didnt read this whole thread... i admit... i hope someone has already said this... KEEP it iLLEGAL

all my friends smoke it... my best one is like "hardcore super skunk northern lights shit, grow your own in the bush and water it every friggin day blah balhasd ghasdlkgj i dunno... get rid of it..

anyone ever think that i would destroy your mind?

Daval 04-21-2003 10:54 AM

Decriminalize and regulate.

Mango 04-21-2003 10:56 AM

In Canada itis more or less decriminalized. Often they don't even make you pay a fine.

ronan 04-21-2003 11:10 AM

oh yeah... someone talked about x?... oh my.. you should meet my ex... went from one pill every now and then to 6 every bloody weekend... i dunno... it just really ticks me off... how could something be that good? she absoloutely knows its bad for her and that its fucking her life up but she cant get off the shit... i wanna try but i dont.. cos she is now fucked.. any way... pot is the same but isnt... i think all the people that want to legalise it are just addicted to it...... i could argue either way for an hour but in the end i rekon it should be illegal

Fly 04-21-2003 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Daval
Decriminalize and regulate.
it's as easy as that.

butthead 04-21-2003 01:16 PM

Quote:

anyone ever think that i would destroy your mind?
Anyone ever think that alcohol would do that and more? Nope, obviously not enough to justify prohibition.

sgtcarrot 04-26-2003 11:04 PM

I lived in Belgium, where it has just been decriminalized. We smoked all the time, and still went to work and took care of our business. In the evenings we hung out and smoked, had lots of interesting conversations. One good thing was no hangovers. And nobody every did or wanted to do anything illegal.

Ask me, you decriminalize pot, and nothing much would change to the social fabric. Sure, tax it, and regulate it; but the people who do not want to smoke, wont. The people who do will. And there are consequences, but just like alcohol and cigarettes, people will have to weigh the consequences themselves.

I do not think that the govt should try to over regulate things. Pot was legal in the US until the 60's a nd 70's. Jefferson and Washington had hemp farms. The dollar bill is made of hemp.
Now all of a sudden, after centuries of use, we need to be saved from ourselves. Right.

At least the tax money could go to education, something that would benefit us all.

=) Brought to you by a very stoned me.

User Name 04-27-2003 08:52 AM

I agree with whoever that said that it should be regulated like alcohol. Call me ignorant, but I don't see a significant difference between the two. Both fuck you up. However, I have never been either drunk or high. At least if it's legal, our jails wouldnt be as overcrowded and there would be less drug-related conflicts on the streets.

sixate 04-27-2003 09:13 AM

I've been avoiding this, but I just had to come and get a good laugh. I know a ton of people who smoke a shitload of weed. They are all lazy potheads who don't pay their bills, can't hold a job, and don't take care of their families. Then bitch that life sucks. They're too dumb to realize the reason life sucks is because they've made dumb choices and are completely wasting their lives. I guess that's OK though, huh? Are their some people who can regulate their intake? I'm sure their is. But, what happens when these adults who can control it have kids? Their kids will find out that they are smoking weed. Kids are not dumb. They'll see mom and dad doing the shit and start themselves. I guess it's OK to have a 13 year smoking weed too, huh? Weed smoking will most likely turn into usage of other harder drugs. How the fuck are some weed smoking parents gonna tell their kids not to smoke. If they don't care that their kids are fucking themselves up at a young age then their kids should be taken away from them.

GreenCloud 04-28-2003 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by genka
and good-bye to most pot-related crime........ Also, good-bye to nat'l debt.
wtf genka? exactly what "pot-related crime" are you refering to?
and as far as the nat'l debt going away due to taxation of marijuana - HA! that's really funny dude. our government has no clue how to stick to a budget or save money. our debt'll never go away, because so much tax money gets wasted and none of the people in charge give a shit.

and LordEden, you might want to clarify those prices you named for the non-smokers here at tfp. otherwise, you're just spreading further misinformation. you know that we pay - by far - some of the highest prices in the country, because we get some of the best weed in the country. people that don't smoke weed or don't smoke often wouldn't realize that the $50 an eighth you and i pay is exceptionaly high. keep in mind that that's around 4 times what most folks pay, if not more - we take this for granted, but a lot of people wouldn't have any way of knowing the difference

sixate, i have to disagree with your example about parents letting 13 year olds smoke weed. first of all, what parent is gonna let that happen? there's plenty of things parents do that they wouldn't let their 13 year old get away with, like smoking(cigarettes), drinking, and fucking, or, for that matter, driving a car. would you let a 13 year old look around on "off the wayside"? while i do agree with your comment"If they don't care that their kids are fucking themselves up at a young age then their kids should be taken away from them," i think that that has to do with being a shitty parent, and has nothing to do with being a pothead. however, i'm going to leave my disagreement at that; i know i can't change your mind about weed, and wouldn't try to. drugs are one of those issues - like politics, religion, and sex - that everyone has strong feelings about, and refuses to change one way or another. i just hope that you realize that there are both "good potheads" and "bad potheads", just as there are good and bad people in any group. would i myself let my (hypothetical) 13 year old smoke pot? hell no! but i'm also not gonna tell any kid that i might have that it's evil, only that they need to wait till they're older and always be responsible about it. i intend to tell my kids all about both the good AND bad sides of drugs when they're old enough to understand, and let them make their own decisions. if they want to do drugs, i can't stop them(i should know, both my parents are/were strict as hell, niether of them do drugs, not even alcohol, and my dad's a cop - and none of that ever stopped me from getting high) - but i can at least try to do the best i can to prepare them to make informed decisions. heck, if my kid was grown-up and smoking weed on his own, i'd smoke with him - but he also better damn well be able to support his own habits, pay his bills and keep things together otherwise.

as far as legalizing or decriminalizing, (surprisingly, i realize) i actually support decriminilization over legalization. i don't wanna go to prison for the rest of my life because some asshole cop got lucky enough to find a bag on me, but i also don't like the idea of the government or some big corporation growing/controlling my shit either.

strickendumb 04-28-2003 11:11 AM

I think to each his own. . . do what you want to do. Its not illegal to kill yourself, so why not?

Captain Canada 04-28-2003 11:20 AM

I think it should be decriminalized atleast.

butthead 04-28-2003 02:24 PM

Quote:

I've been avoiding this, but I just had to come and get a good laugh. I know a ton of people who smoke a shitload of weed. They are all lazy potheads who don't pay their bills, can't hold a job, and don't take care of their families. Then bitch that life sucks. They're too dumb to realize the reason life sucks is because they've made dumb choices and are completely wasting their lives. I guess that's OK though, huh? Are their some people who can regulate their intake? I'm sure their is. But, what happens when these adults who can control it have kids? Their kids will find out that they are smoking weed. Kids are not dumb. They'll see mom and dad doing the shit and start themselves. I guess it's OK to have a 13 year smoking weed too, huh? Weed smoking will most likely turn into usage of other harder drugs. How the fuck are some weed smoking parents gonna tell their kids not to smoke. If they don't care that their kids are fucking themselves up at a young age then their kids should be taken away from them.
I don't mean to offend, but this is coming close to strawman. Weak, atypical hypothetical situations do not justify prohibition.

Phaenx 04-28-2003 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by butthead
I don't mean to offend, but this is coming close to strawman. Weak, atypical hypothetical situations do not justify prohibition.
Marijuana will stunt your brain-growth and inhibit your memory according to numerous studies, if you're out for the truth, there you are. Admittedly, this may not be as harmful as tobacco or alcohol, which I believe should be illegal as well (even though they have more merit for being legal than marijuana does), but that is another topic.

The reason it should continue to be prohibited is because it is both harmful to a single individual, as well as society at large. Can't have a bunch of dumbasses running around here taking time off of work to discuss what colors are cool to their friends.

butthead 04-28-2003 03:14 PM

Quote:

Marijuana will stunt your brain-growth and inhibit your memory according to numerous studies
Please provide references for the former.

Quote:

this may not be as harmful as tobacco or alcohol
Marijuana is not as harmful as tobacco or alcohol.

Quote:

even though they have more merit for being legal than marijuana does
As far as public safety, no.

Quote:

The reason it should continue to be prohibited is because it is both harmful to a single individual, as well as society at large.
Prove it.

Quote:

Can't have a bunch of dumbasses running around here taking time off of work to discuss what colors are cool to their friends.
I hope for arguments sake you have more than that up your sleeve.

yabobo 04-28-2003 04:54 PM

I smoked a ton of it in the 80's and 90's

It hurt my learning potential got me fired from jobs,
and now I have to check that box that says

HAVE YOU EVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONEY

Don't do it it's not worth it your not as smart as you think....

Yabobo

Phaenx 04-28-2003 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by butthead
Please provide references for the former.



Marijuana is not as harmful as tobacco or alcohol.



As far as public safety, no.



Prove it.



I hope for arguments sake you have more than that up your sleeve.

I have all sorts of things up my sleeve, thanks for taking an interest.

1) THC, the main active ingredient in marijuana, binds to and activates specific receptors, known as cannabinoid receptors. There are many of these receptors in parts of the brain that control memory, thought, concentration, time and depth perception, coordinated movement, learning and memory, higher cognitive functions such as judgment, and pleasure.

Marijuana's damage to short-term memory seems to occur because THC alters the way in which information is processed by the hippocampus, a brain area responsible for memory formation. Laboratory rats treated with THC displayed the same reduced ability to perform tasks requiring short-term memory as other rats showed after nerve cells in their hippocampus were destroyed.65 In addition, the THC-treated rats had the greatest difficulty with the tasks precisely during the time when the drug was interfering most with the normal functioning of cells in the hippocampus.

As people age, they normally lose neurons in the hippocampus, which decreases their ability to remember events. Chronic THC exposure may hasten the age-related loss of hippocampal neurons. In one series of studies, rats exposed to THC every day for 8 months (approximately 30 percent of their lifespan), when examined at 11 to 12 months of age, showed nerve cell loss equivalent to that of unexposed animals twice their age.

http://www.nida.nih.gov/ResearchRepo...arijuana3.html

Heishman SJ, et al. Comparative effects of alcoho...[PMID:9264076]

Sullivan JM Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory: Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying learning and memory impairments produced by cannabinoids.

Misner DL: Mechanism of cannabinoid effects on long-term potentiation and depression in hippocampal CA1 neurons.



2) No, the merit lies within the it serving some sort of purpose; tax money. That's actually worth something, you can't tax marijuana if people grow their own, and if you try, it will be far more complicated then the current fight against drugs.



3) See 1.



4) There you go.

Eviltree 04-28-2003 06:52 PM

I think it should be de-criminalized, but with GWB's 'war on drugs' and all that propaganda, it is quite unlikely.

bubbaspike 04-28-2003 07:04 PM

This "dreaded" thread sure has spurred alot of comments.
I say leagleise it and let people be.

Fly 04-28-2003 09:02 PM

glad to see no flaming goin' on.

good points,bad points.....bring 'em on.

de-criminalize

butthead 04-29-2003 03:18 PM

Quote:

Marijuana's damage to short-term memory seems to occur because THC alters the way in which information is processed by the hippocampus, a brain area responsible for memory formation. Laboratory rats treated with THC displayed the same reduced ability to perform tasks requiring short-term memory as other rats showed after nerve cells in their hippocampus were destroyed.
Heyser, C.J.; Hampson, R.E.; and Deadwyler, S.A. Effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol on delayed match to sample performance in rats: Alterations in short-term memory associated with changes in task-specific firing of hippocampal cells. Journal of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics 264(1):294-307, 1993.

Acute, reversible actions are not damage: "However, unlike the effects of hippocampal lesions or neurotoxic damage, the effects of delta-9-THC were completely reversible within 24 hr of injection." It later went on to state "...this effect could serve as the basis for the well characterized short-term memory and other cognitive deficits reported in humans after smoking marijuana," popularly known as being high.

Quote:

As people age, they normally lose neurons in the hippocampus, which decreases their ability to remember events. Chronic THC exposure may hasten the age-related loss of hippocampal neurons. In one series of studies, rats exposed to THC every day for 8 months (approximately 30 percent of their lifespan), when examined at 11 to 12 months of age, showed nerve cell loss equivalent to that of unexposed animals twice their age.
Landfield, P.W.; Cadwallader, L.B.; and Vinsant, S. Quantitative changes in hippocampal structure following long exposure to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: Possible mediation of glucocorticoid systems. Brain Res 443(1-2):47-62, 1988.

"However, the animals appeared to be only minimally affected behaviorally by the doses used (highest dose: 8 mg/kg) and no effects of THC were observed on several ultrastructural variables, including synaptic density." What are the implications? How is this supposed to justify prohibition?

Quote:

Heishman SJ, et al. Comparative effects of alcoho...[PMID:9264076]

Sullivan JM Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory: Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying learning and memory impairments produced by cannabinoids.

Misner DL: Mechanism of cannabinoid effects on long-term potentiation and depression in hippocampal CA1 neurons.
Explain the implications of these and their findings in regards to safety and prohibition.

christophagust 04-30-2003 01:55 AM

I would agree with the many who say to decriminalize and regulate similarly to alcohol or tobacco. As a note I do feel the alcohol age should be lower.

studkickass 04-30-2003 11:52 AM

legalize... so I won't go to jail as I am a bud vaporizer.

butthead 04-30-2003 12:31 PM

Taken from drugwarfacts.org:

Quote:

In the Institute of Medicine's report on medical marijuana, the researchers examined the physiological risks of using marijuana and cautioned, "Marijuana is not a completely benign substance. It is a powerful drug with a variety of effects. However, except for the harms associated with smoking, the adverse effects of marijuana use are within the range of effects tolerated for other medications."

Source: Janet E. Joy, Stanley J. Watson, Jr., and John A Benson, Jr., "Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base," Division of Neuroscience and Behavioral Research, Institute of Medicine (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999).


The Institute of Medicine's 1999 report on medical marijuana examined the question of whether marijuana could diminish patients' immune system - an important question when considering marijuana use by AIDS and cancer patients. The report concluded that, "the short-term immunosuppressive effects are not well established but, if they exist, are not likely great enough to preclude a legitimate medical use."

Source: Janet E. Joy, Stanley J. Watson, Jr., and John A Benson, Jr., "Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base," Division of Neuroscience and Behavioral Research, Institute of Medicine (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999).


In spite of the established medical value of marijuana, doctors are presently permitted to prescribe cocaine and morphine - but not marijuana.

Source: The Controlled Substances Act of 1970, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801 et seq.


Organizations that have endorsed medical access to marijuana include: the Institute of Medicine, the American Academy of Family Physicians; American Bar Association; American Public Health Association; American Society of Addiction Medicine; AIDS Action Council; British Medical Association; California Academy of Family Physicians; California Legislative Council for Older Americans; California Medical Association; California Nurses Association; California Pharmacists Association; California Society of Addiction Medicine; California-Pacific Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church; Colorado Nurses Association; Consumer Reports Magazine; Kaiser Permanente; Lymphoma Foundation of America; Multiple Sclerosis California Action Network; National Association of Attorneys General; National Association of People with AIDS; National Nurses Society on Addictions; New Mexico Nurses Association; New York State Nurses Association; New England Journal of Medicine; and Virginia Nurses Association.

Many organizations have favorable positions (e.g., unimpeded research) on medical marijuana. These groups include: The Institute of Medicine, The American Cancer Society; American Medical Association; Australian Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health; California Medical Association; Federation of American Scientists; Florida Medical Association; and the National Academy of Sciences.

The Controlled Substances Act of 1970 established five categories, or "schedules," into which all illicit and prescription drugs were placed. Marijuana was placed in Schedule I, which defines the substance as having a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use in the United States, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision. To contrast, over 90 published reports and studies have shown marijuana has medical efficacy.

Source: The Controlled Substances Act of 1970, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801 et seq.; Common Sense for Drug Policy, Compendium of Reports, Research and Articles Demonstrating the Effectiveness of Medical Marijuana, Vol. I & Vol. II (Falls Church, VA: Common Sense for Drug Policy, March 1997).

On September 6, 1988, the Drug Enforcement Administration's Chief Administrative Law Judge, Francis L. Young, ruled:
"Marijuana, in its natural form, is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known....[T]he provisions of the [Controlled Substances] Act permit and require the transfer of marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule II. It would be unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious for the DEA to continue to stand between those sufferers and the benefits of this substance."

Source: US Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Agency, "In the Matter of Marijuana Rescheduling Petition," [Docket #86-22] (September 6, 1988), p. 57.


The DEA's Administrative Law Judge, Francis Young concluded: "In strict medical terms marijuana is far safer than many foods we commonly consume. For example, eating 10 raw potatoes can result in a toxic response. By comparison, it is physically impossible to eat enough marijuana to induce death. Marijuana in its natural form is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man. By any measure of rational analysis marijuana can be safely used within the supervised routine of medical care."

Source: US Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Agency, "In the Matter of Marijuana Rescheduling Petition," [Docket #86-22], (September 6, 1988), p. 57.

Between 1978 and 1997, 35 states and the District of Columbia passed legislation recognizing marijuana's medicinal value.
States include: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, IL, IA, LA, MA, ME, MI, MN, MO, MT, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OH, OK, OR, RI, SC, TN, TX, VT, VA, WA, WV, and WI.

butthead 04-30-2003 12:43 PM

Taken from drugwarfacts.org:

Quote:

In 2000, 46.5 percent of the 1,579,566 total arrests for drug abuse violations were for marijuana -- a total of 734,497. Of those, 646,042 people were arrested for possession alone. This is an increase over 1999, when a total of 704,812 Americans were arrested for marijuana offenses, of which 620,541 were for possession alone.

<table bgcolor="black" border="1" cellpadding="2"><tr><th align="center" colspan="5"><center>Marijuana Arrests and Total Drug Arrests in the US</center></th><tr><center><td>Year</td><td>Total Drug Arrests</td><td>Total Marijuana Arrests</td><td>Marijuana Trafficking/Sale Arrests</td><td>Marijuana Possession Arrests</td></center></tr><tr><td>2000</td><td>1,579,566</td><td>734,497</td><td>88,455</td><td>646,042</td></tr><tr><td>1999</td><td>1,532,200</td><td>704,812</td><td>84,271</td><td>620,541</td></tr><tr><td>1998</td><td>1,559,100</td><td>682,885</td><td>84,191</td><td>598,694</td></tr><tr><td>1995</td><td>1,476,100</td><td>588,964</td><td>85,614</td><td>503,350</td></tr><tr><td>1990</td><td>1,089,500</td><td>326,850</td><td>66,460</td><td>260,390</td></tr><tr><td>1980</td><td>580,900</td><td>401,982</td>
<td>63,318</td><td>338,664</td></tr></table>


Sources: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports for the United States 2000 (Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 2001), pp. 215-216, Tables 29 and 4.1; Uniform Crime Reports for the United States 1999 (Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000), pp. 211-212; Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports for the United States 1998 (Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1999), pp. 209-210; FBI, UCR for the US 1995 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1996), pp. 207-208; FBI, UCR for the US 1990 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1991), pp. 173-174; FBI, UCR for the US 1980 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1981), pp. 189-191.

"Tetrahydrocannabinol is a very safe drug. Laboratory animals (rats, mice, dogs, monkeys) can tolerate doses of up to 1,000 mg/kg (milligrams per kilogram). This would be equivalent to a 70 kg person swallowing 70 grams of the drug -- about 5,000 times more than is required to produce a high. Despite the widespread illicit use of cannabis there are very few if any instances of people dying from an overdose. In Britain, official government statistics listed five deaths from cannabis in the period 1993-1995 but on closer examination these proved to have been deaths due to inhalation of vomit that could not be directly attributed to cannabis (House of Lords Report, 1998). By comparison with other commonly used recreational drugs these statistics are impressive."

Source: Iversen, Leslie L., PhD, FRS, "The Science of Marijuana" (London, England: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 178, citing House of Lords, Select Committee on Science and Technology, "Cannabis -- The Scientific and Medical Evidence" (London, England: The Stationery Office, Parliament, 1998).

A Johns Hopkins study published in May 1999, examined marijuana's effects on cognition on 1,318 participants over a 15 year period. Researchers reported "no significant differences in cognitive decline between heavy users, light users, and nonusers of cannabis." They also found "no male-female differences in cognitive decline in relation to cannabis use." "These results ... seem to provide strong evidence of the absence of a long-term residual effect of cannabis use on cognition," they concluded.

Source: Constantine G. Lyketsos, Elizabeth Garrett, Kung-Yee Liang, and James C. Anthony. (1999). "Cannabis Use and Cognitive Decline in Persons under 65 Years of Age," American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 149, No. 9.

Commissioned by President Nixon in 1972, the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse concluded that "Marihuana's relative potential for harm to the vast majority of individual users and its actual impact on society does not justify a social policy designed to seek out and firmly punish those who use it. This judgment is based on prevalent use patterns, on behavior exhibited by the vast majority of users and on our interpretations of existing medical and scientific data. This position also is consistent with the estimate by law enforcement personnel that the elimination of use is unattainable."

Source: Shafer, Raymond P., et al, Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding, Ch. V, (Washington DC: National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse, 1972).

The World Health Organization released a study in March 1998 that states: "there are good reasons for saying that [the risks from cannabis] would be unlikely to seriously [compare to] the public health risks of alcohol and tobacco even if as many people used cannabis as now drink alcohol or smoke tobacco."

Source: Hall, W., Room, R. & Bondy, S., WHO Project on Health Implications of Cannabis Use: A Comparative Appraisal of the Health and Psychological Consequences of Alcohol, Cannabis, Nicotine and Opiate Use, August 28, 1995, (contained in original version, but deleted from official version) (Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, March 1998).

Some claim that cannabis use leads to "adult amotivation." The World Health Organization report addresses the issue and states, "it is doubtful that cannabis use produces a well defined amotivational syndrome." The report also notes that the value of studies which support the "adult amotivation" theory are "limited by their small sample sizes" and lack of representative social/cultural groups.

Source: Hall, W., Room, R. & Bondy, S., WHO Project on Health Implications of Cannabis Use: A Comparative Appraisal of the Health and Psychological Consequences of Alcohol, Cannabis, Nicotine and Opiate Use, August 28, 1995 (Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, March 1998).


Australian researchers found that regions giving on-the-spot fines to marijuana users rather than harsher criminal penalties did not cause marijuana use to increase.

Source: Ali, Robert, et al., The Social Impacts of the Cannabis Expiation Notice Scheme in South Australia: Summary Report (Canberra, Australia: Department of Health and Aged Care, 1999), p. 44.

Since 1969, government-appointed commissions in the United States, Canada, England, Australia, and the Netherlands concluded, after reviewing the scientific evidence, that marijuana's dangers had previously been greatly exaggerated, and urged lawmakers to drastically reduce or eliminate penalties for marijuana possession.

Source: Advisory Committee on Drug Dependence, Cannabis (London, England: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1969); Canadian Government Commission of Inquiry, The Non-Medical Use of Drugs (Ottawa, Canada: Information Canada, 1970); The National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse, Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding, (Nixon-Shafer Report) (Washington, DC: USGPO, 1972); Werkgroep Verdovende Middelen, Background and Risks of Drug Use (The Hague, The Netherlands: Staatsuigeverij, 1972); Senate Standing Committee on Social Welfare, Drug Problems in Australia-An Intoxicated Society (Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1977); Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, "The classification of cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971" (London, England, UK: Home Office, March 2002), available on the web from http://www.drugs.gov.uk/ReportsandPu...rugsadvice.pdf ; House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Third Report, "The Government's Drugs Policy: Is It Working?" (London, England, UK: Parliament, May 9, 2002), from the web at http://www.publications.parliament.u.../318/31802.htm and "Cannabis: Our Position for a Canadian Public Policy," report of the Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs (Ottawa, Canada: Senate of Canada, September 2002).

The Canadian Senate's Special Committee on Illegal Drugs recommended in its 2002 final report on cannabis policy that "the Government of Canada amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act to create a criminal exemption scheme. This legislation should stipulate the conditions for obtaining licenses as well as for producing and selling cannabis; criminal penalties for illegal trafficking and export; and the preservation of criminal penalties for all activities falling outside the scope of the exemption scheme."

Source: "Cannabis: Our Position for a Canadian Public Policy," report of the Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs (Ottawa, Canada: Senate of Canada, September 2002), p. 46.

In May of 1998, the Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, National Working Group on Addictions Policy released policy a discussion document which recommended, "The severity of punishment for a cannabis possession charge should be reduced. Specifically, cannabis possession should be converted to a civil violation under the Contraventions Act." The paper further noted that, "The available evidence indicates that removal of jail as a sentencing option would lead to considerable cost savings without leading to increases in rates of cannabis use."

Source: Single, Eric, Cannabis Control in Canada: Options Regarding Possession (Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, May 1998).

"Our conclusion is that the present law on cannabis produces more harm than it prevents. It is very expensive of the time and resources of the criminal justice system and especially of the police. It inevitably bears more heavily on young people in the streets of inner cities, who are also more likely to be from minority ethnic communities, and as such is inimical to police-community relations. It criminalizes large numbers of otherwise law-abiding, mainly young, people to the detriment of their futures. It has become a proxy for the control of public order; and it inhibits accurate education about the relative risks of different drugs including the risks of cannabis itself."

Source: Police Foundation of the United Kingdom, "Drugs and the Law: Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Misuse of Drugs Act of 1971", April 4, 2000. The Police Foundation, based in London, England, is a nonprofit organization presided over by Charles, Crown Prince of Wales, which promotes research, debate and publication to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of policing in the UK.

I look forward to hearing your rebuttal.

Minx 04-30-2003 01:55 PM

Legalize it. Sorry but I would much rather see a rapist/murderer/true blue criminal going to jail than some poor sap because he had a few joints on him. Or please, go after the heroin & crack dealers first.

BigJayz 04-30-2003 04:13 PM

legalize it and control it! There is no reason that the government should be telling me I can't smoke pot, and there is no reason they should be fighting a losing battle with the war on it. Hell they should be growing the chronic and making more money off of me!

imemine 04-30-2003 06:58 PM

Whatever happens I'll still smoke it!

GreenCloud 04-30-2003 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by imemine
Whatever happens I'll still smoke it!
:D hey man, i gotta agree with you there:cool:

forgotten_dream 05-01-2003 07:16 AM

Absolutely. It doesn't cause any sort of adverse affects that aren't allready covered by alcohol and tobacco. I say legalize it, control it as a drug, and leave the pot heads alone as long as they stay off the road and don't endanger anyone.

bender 05-01-2003 09:26 AM

Okay, I've been informed and educated on both sides of this debate and am trully impressed as to the depth of knowlege on this topic.

snowace56 05-01-2003 10:26 AM

i say legalize, we spend all this money stopping it at the border doesn't do shit. kinda like tobacco and alcohol, just place an age limit on it. i mean tobacco kills 200,000 a year and how much does mary jane kill...ZERO!!!!!

potifar 05-01-2003 06:17 PM

prohibition of anything is silly and impossible

spankthru 05-01-2003 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by strickendumb
I think to each his own. . . do what you want to do. Its not illegal to kill yourself, so why not?
<br>
<br>
Well, technically, suicide is a crime. Only thing is they really can't do much about it.


As for marijuana leg/decrim, i feel that you should be able to grow it, and buy it from licensed producers, much like how alcohol is sold. You must have a licence to be able to produce the product that you sell. As I'm talking about alcohol, call me extreme, but I think it should be illegalized. I heard somebody quote "I would rather step over a giggling hippie than confront a drunk with a knife." And I really think that is true. When a person is high on weed, they usually become more careful, ironically, rather than a drunk becoming more and more reckless. However, I would love to be able to find more unbias information about the long term effects of marijuana. The people that say it's comepletey harmless are usually the stoners, and the ones that say that it will adversely affect you and everybody else in your gene pool as long as your family blood remains are usually the ones with extreme anti drug ronald reagan administration thoughts. anyhow... back to the forums

HiThereDear 05-16-2003 02:33 PM

butthead-

very nice, thanks for taking the time and effort - I was thinking about it but decided I was too lazy (not from smoking weed though, lol).

butthead 05-16-2003 04:28 PM

:)

Ransom342 05-18-2003 07:08 PM

Tax and regulate, Let the cops investigate Crime.

MacGnG 05-19-2003 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by degrawj
decriminalize it. if you don't want to smoke it, and hate it, that's fine. then don't smoke it. but some people out there do use it responsibly, and the punishment right now is way to severe.

i completely agree


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360