![]() |
The Trilogy meter
|
I've always disagreed with most about The Matrix...
My Matrix meter goes: [EDIT: My meter didn't quite work like I thought it would, but:] I enjoyed the second so much more than the other two... |
I disagree with Blade, the third is far and away the best!
|
diehard 3 beats 2. all spiderman movies suck ass. LOTR 2 beats 1 by a longshot.
|
Jurassic Park 3 shouldn't even have an ounce of blue in it. That movie was crap.
|
I don't agree with the BTTF one.
My BTTF meter goes: BTTF 1: ======================== BTTF 2: ===== BTTF 3: ================= |
These are pretty clsoe except for a few, esp. The Godfather one. One was equal to the third IMHO. Second was 1005 great.
That 'tis all for now. |
There is no Matrix trilogy. :expressionless:
|
What about Critters!?
|
or tremors!
|
Here is one redone using data directly from Rotten Tomatoes: Irony for Me: The Trilogy Tomatometer
And here's a sequel (hah!) to the original Trilogy chart, also by Dan Meth: http://30.media.tumblr.com/IwM8PIQ02...Wo1_r2_500.png DAN METH |
I knew there had to be something better.
Thanks telekinetic (and honestly, I don't know what I'm doing; I shoul be following Dan Meth's updates more closely than every few months.) Also, I had no idea some films even had a sequel, let alone a subsquent title to the sequel of the original (namely, Mannequin, Young Guns, The Gods Must Be Crazy, Bill & Ted, Caddyshack, Arthur, ) |
Hmm...
There is no Bill & Ted 3 (though Keanu has hinted that they may make one when he and Alex Winter turn 50 in the past) or Wayne's World 3, yet both of these phantom sequels are ranked higher than the two that actually exist... EDIT: D'oh! After letting this bug me for a minute and taking a closer look at the blog (specifically its date), I get it.... |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project