|  | 
|  10-19-2003, 10:41 AM | #1 (permalink) | 
| Eh? Location: Somewhere over the rainbow | 
				
				1982 Reliant K
			 Alright, so, i have stumbled upon a 1982 Reliant K w/ 45,xxx miles on it, no rust, amazing condition, etc. The old lady is asking 500 for it.  I need a good beater car for the winter, and I think that this would be a good investment. However, I'm asking everyone here for input on what sucks about the K-cars, etc.  Any suggestions on stuff i should do is welcome.   Also, how have i seen videos of these cars going 10's in the 1/4, do they just drop a total new engine/tranny in them, as they are uber light or something? <I dont plan on doing this, im just curious> Anyways, TIA, and if i need to clarify anything, just ask.  | 
|   | 
|  10-19-2003, 06:45 PM | #3 (permalink) | 
| Junkie Location: San Diego, CA. | i would definately grab it, specially for that price.  You cant go wrong at 500 bucks for a running car, let alone one in great shape, that old, with only 45,000 miles on it. Id say its a real nice deal.  Plus, turbo dodge K cars can eb reasonably reliable, very strong blocks to work on and up the boost to be a bad ass car.  Cant go wrong with throwing a turbo and/or more boost at it.  I think it would be a fun project car too, not just a winter beater. 
				__________________ Dont cry kid, It's not your fault you suck. | 
|   | 
|  10-20-2003, 08:12 PM | #7 (permalink) | 
| Eh? Location: Somewhere over the rainbow | Ok, I bought the car, runs good, everything is sound, great buy. But my god is this thing slow, i mean, i can floor it, and it has no noticable pickup, its ok, as like i said its a beater, but still its damn slow. I'm still glad i got it, just simple fact is, this car is gul durn slow, but is in really nice condition, and even had a recent tune up<New belts, hoses, tires, and fuel filter, along w/ oil change and a new Battery> all in all im quite happy   | 
|   | 
|  10-20-2003, 08:54 PM | #8 (permalink) | 
| Junkie Location: Florida | Pretty much all early-80s cars were gutless pigs due to the fuel crisis. V8 Mustangs and Camaros from that era would get spanked by most minivans on the market now.  Now drop a 2.2 turbo in that thing, and it's a different story. Those cars only weigh around 2400 pounds, so ~250 hp would really make it haul! | 
|   | 
|  10-21-2003, 06:23 AM | #9 (permalink) | |
| Junkie Location: Toronto | Quote: 
 I remember the guy said that it was kind of a dog in the guts dept. I took it out for a test spin and it did feel like i was dragging a boat anchor behind the car. I bought it and put a new set of plugs in it and ignition wires and it was remarkable. It turns out i had a bad plug. That thing could really move believe it or not. I suggest you try advancing the timing a wee bit if you haven't already. You will be suprised you may get a bit more pep out of it. | |
|   | 
| Tags | 
| 1982, reliant | 
| 
 |  |