Boobs: What's the deal? (NSFW)

I will have to strongly agree. I need more options.

 

That is precisely the point I was trying to make; it's possible, but not certain the appearance is sufficient for anything, even if it perceived as such. At least as far as I know there is no real consensus on the point.

Perhaps an example, the best I can manage, lets say things are the way you suppose. Men are attracted to large breasts as a matter of advertisement of fitness. Surely breast size would increase as a de facto increase in fitness would likely result from increased access to mates (and therefore the ability to be more discriminating in your choice...). Which is fine and dandy, except that we've already also supposed that breasts aren't actually related to fitness in any way (Blasphemy, I know, but the question at hand was to address exactly that, appearance only.)

What would that mean for men that aren't attracted to large breasts? They could zero in on fitness signals that are actually accurate, and thus the propensity to ignore false advertisements of fitness could have great potential value. See the problem? It's not clear which way the scales would tip, or if they may tip different ways in different circumstances.

 

Like them all

 

Ahh, but I'll argue all day about large breasts because of personal preference, but in my original post on this, I started by noting how small breasts might also be attractive on a biological basis (Youth, yet nubile, and health), and ended with a discussion of sexual imprinting, which could make a preference for any size and shape on an individual basis. How many guys in their 40s and 50s have a thing for modestly sized cone shaped tits with puffy nipples because of the early, illegal work of Traci Lords? (I know one offhand.)

I think the most simple thing one can say about boobs is "It's Complicated".

 

quality rather than quantity is what attracts this guy. Of course, you can't really tell much of the time because bra technology has improved so much. But that's not a bad thing.

 

I think volume might be a better word there, Quaid.

 

Volume and quantity.... Within reason.

 

I see what you did there. And I want to party with you.

 

http://d24w6bsrhbeh9d.cloudfront.net/photo/2703779_700b.jpg

I'll have to remember this one...

 

nice

 

Loving all the comments about preferring smaller boobs guys. Word of advice - if your SO is smaller, tell her how much you love them. Being constantly bombarded with pictures of brainless eejits with huge knockers makes us feel a bit inadequate sometimes, especially during hormonal times - chocolate & alcohol also work well during said times for the record.
--- merged: Jun 15, 2012 at 6:57 PM ---

Let's be honest, if men had what women have, they'd have to give up work - there wouldn't be enough hours in the day.
--- merged: Jun 15, 2012 at 7:03 PM ---

Something all men should know - don't treat the female orgasm as some kind of challenge. It's very bloody annoying

 

Surely it's quality and quantity.

 

Boobs are like Martini's, one's not enough and three's too many.

 

Agreed

 

Utterly preposterous.

A woman would never respond that way. It's like a bad porn script.

That comic is as realistic as a heterosexual man demonstrating more than the Crayola 8-color in feelings.

Dunno, man. My current girlfriend has some pretty spectacular tits. You know how you improve on that? Give her six... like a cat.

Yeaaah.

 

And perhaps a bit of a lightweight, but we won't hold that against him. ;-)

 

Hey hey hey!