1. We've had very few donations over the year. I'm going to be short soon as some personal things are keeping me from putting up the money. If you have something small to contribute it's greatly appreciated. Please put your screen name as well so that I can give you credit. Click here: Donations
    Dismiss Notice

Women & Dieting

Discussion in 'Tilted Life and Sexuality' started by SeanMyklKing, Aug 11, 2011.

  1. Cayvmann

    Cayvmann Very Tilted

    I certainly agree with that. I gave up sodas many years ago, and only have one on the rare occasion that I can't get anything else.
     
  2. fflowley

    fflowley Don't just do something, stand there!

    About once a year I enjoy an ice cold original Coca Cola.
    That's about it for me.
    I work with people who sit and sip soda all day long.
     
  3. Cayvmann

    Cayvmann Very Tilted

    I like the small bottles of coke. what are they, 8 ounces?
     
  4. LinaT14

    LinaT14 Vertical

    Location:
    Texas
    Yeah. My dad and half his siblings are diabetic. Adult onset, which is the most prevalent form in the US these days. This form, Type 2 comes from a lifelong abuse of insulin production. On a high carb diet, sometimes even with exercise, your pancreas will actually stop being able to produce insulin. Or, so much insulin is released into the bloodstream to regulate blood sugar levels that it is no longer effective. This is known as insulin resistance.

    If you lost in the gene lottery and have propensity towards obesity or propensity to insulin resistance, any kind of carbs will send you closer and closer to diabetes. Whole grain or not.

    My dad was recently diagnosed with diabetes. If carbs are so good for you then why must he keep track of what he eats, limiting his intake of rice; which, being Asian is like asking a frog not to eat flies? He's still trying to regulate his diabetes with diet, but if his body keeps being pushed to overproducing insulin and blood sugar remaining too high, his pancreas will shut down, he will have to go on a lower carb diet and start taking insulin. My dad has been active all his life; from playing soccer all the way into the beginning of his military career to taking daily walks with my mom now. My parents are in their late 70's now, and ever since I could remember, my mom cooked low fat and low salt. I cook this way as well.

    I've always been active myself. I played soccer through high school, excelled in track, walked onto the BU track team and after college picked up soccer again. Right now I go to the gym several times a week and ride my bike when I can. I could envy people like you, Baraka Guru, but that won't help me keep the weight off or keep me from becoming diabetic myself.

    Don't assume that what works for you will work for everyone. As it is, with all the exercise and the dietetic control I exercise over my appetite, I could stand to lose 20 pounds. Right now I'm sitting at 23% body fat. Yeah. I could be more disciplined, I could always exercise more, too. I plan to get more serious again soon. The Atkins diet worked for me in losing excess fat. Please don't tell me I could lose more weight by eating more carbs. Been there, tried that. Doesn't work for me. Maybe I'm in the minority here when it comes to eating carbs, but looking at the rise of obesity and diabetes in the US, I seriously doubt it.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    LinaT14 , I'm not going to assume anything. If an individual has extreme factors unique to their situation, then of course they should listen to their doctor, especially if it's an interventional treatment.

    I'm sorry to hear about your dad's diabetes. Regardless, this doesn't mean carbs are bad for us in and of themselves. Even those with diabetes can eat three or four servings of starches a day. It depends on the kind of food and on the individual.

    You yourself suggested that a big risk factor for diabetes is being overweight and genetics. However, consuming too many calories (whether starches or fat) rather than simply eating carbohydrates at all would seem to be the bigger risk beyond that.

    I'll say it again: a balanced diet is something I will always support. There are very few, if any, respectable health organizations that will deny starches being a part of a well-balanced diet, diabetic associations included. If carbohydrates are so bad, then why aren't these associations implicating them for people who already have the disease? Could it be because it's not the carbohydrates themselves but rather the type we eat and how much of them we eat?

    When I say "high-carb" diet, I mean 50% to 60%. That's high compared to fad diets like Atkins. Even the American Diabetic Association will suggest 50 to 60 grams of carbohydrates at meals for diabetics, more or less depending on how the individual is managing the diabetes.

    I myself have none of the risk factors for type-2 diabetes, and no genetic risk factors for either type. I'm not eating much more than 60 grams of carbohydrates per meal if I do at all. My risk is low. I know you might consider that lucky, but much of the population also have low risk factors. Even still: carbohydrates aren't bad in and of themselves. I actually have more risk factors for heart disease, which is one reason why I'm glad I switched be a vegan diet, cut back on sugar, and will one day (I swear) exercise more.

    But now we've veered off from dieting and into the causes and treatment of diabetes. If we stick to the topic of people who generally want to lose weight and are otherwise healthy ("overweight" doesn't necessarily mean "unhealthy"), I don't see carbohydrates in and of themselves as a problem.
     
  6. LinaT14

    LinaT14 Vertical

    Location:
    Texas
    Having studied biochemistry, there are certain absolutes that will not change. Aka carbs are sugar. Too much sugar can and will lead to diabetes in some people, but in most people, will only lead to greater fat stores.

    The definitive statement that 'carbs in and of themselves are not a problem' is true, but the US population eats too many carbohydrates at any given time. This is exactly why most of the people eating diets higher in carbs are fat. Diet (definition being 'what you put in your mouth to give your body fuel to continue to function properly') is not an 'across the board', 'everyone needs to eat meat' constant, nor is it good or healthy to eat too many carbs.

    For example, your body can NOT produce certain amino acids. Although possible, it is difficult to eat the right combination of beans and lentils or some other seed type every day and get sufficient amounts of these amino acids for a body to function. However, most people have to eat some meat to get what their bodies require. So I could postulate that meat in and of itself is not bad, which is true also. Likewise, we need to have a certain amount of fat in our diet as well, because some fatty acid chains utilized in our bodies cannot be made from carbs. Therefore, we could say 'fats are not bad for you' as well.

    Problems arise when this happens: When people go on diets, these so-called 'fad diets', they do so with the intention of going back to their old, unhealthy eating habits that were the cause of their weight gain as soon as they can. They lose the weight. The diet works. But every time, everyone gained back all the weight and more because they went back to their 'normal' eating habits; or diet. I propose this again: whatever diet works for you losing weight, stick to it! And exercise!

    As a side note, several diets, including Atkins and the South Beach diet have a 'maintainance mode'. And every body is different. Some people can eat more carbs than others and maintain healthy weight in doing so. Others can't. The point is, that most of these low carb diets demand healthier eating from the get-go-- lose the complex carbohydrate/tasty comfort food/ bread/junk food and eat fruits and veggies instead. Doesn't that sound reasonable?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    If you studied biochemistry, you probably know that carbohydrates consist of different types of glucose structures, namely, glucose (a simple sugar) and starches (groups of glucose held together by glycosidic bonds). This is why not all carbohydrates are the same, especially as far as blood sugar, fat accumulation, etc., are concerned. Plus there are other factors of nutrition, such as other accompanying macronutrients and each food's micronutrient profile. For example, sweet potatoes =/= Coca-Cola.

    I agree that no one should eat too many carbs, and it's my suspicion that too many Americans are "cornfed." If the majority of carbs consumed by Americans switched overnight to mainly oatmeal, whole wheat, legumes, and sweet potatoes, I wouldn't be surprised to see the average waistline and scale value drop within a year (all other things being equal). No, the obesity epidemic is fuelled by HFCS, refined grains, sugar, etc., in addition to a few other things. I sincerely doubt Americans have a problem of eating too many whole grains and legumes.

    Before we carry on: This is untrue. It's actually not that difficult to get the full spectrum of amino acids from plant sources alone. Most people likely don't need to eat any meat to get what their bodies require.

    This is why I don't really believe in diets but rather changing your lifestyle regarding your eating habits. For example, I'm a vegan, but I'm not on a diet. It's my lifestyle, not a goal with a specific target.

    I cannot deny cutting out junk as being a good thing. Though I still cannot accept complex carbohydrates being as demonized as they are. I understand that Atkins and the like have maintenance modes that aren't too bad, and I understand that people have different body types, but to suggest that "carbs are bad" is misleading.

    People are different, I get that. Some have heavy builds and slow metabolism, while other have slight builds and high metabolism, but this should be kept in mind when having an ideal weight and shape in mind. Those with heavier builds are not likely to look like Kate Moss without taking extreme and potentially dangerous measures. Some people are technically classified as "overweight" according to BMI but are actually a picture of health "under the hood." Should such a person go low-carb crazy because they want to look like a model? I think health is more important than appearances.

    I would never suggest that it's okay to eat 80 or 90% as carbohydrates. Again, I'll say a balanced diet of 50 or 60% is just fine. Food selection and overall calories are more important considerations.

    If someone wants to go low-carb to hit a certain weight, then they can go right ahead. It's their body. I just won't sit idly by while people posit the idea that carbohydrates are universally a bad thing. They aren't.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. BLU

    Blu New Member

    I think the media needs to take a lot of the blame for women being so obsessed with their bodies that they try these crazy fad diets that supposedly all the celebs are on. Magazines are constantly photoshopping pics of celebs and are so quick to jump on someone if they've put on a couple of pounds. Women can then become obsessed with what the "perfect" body should be. There is no such thing as the "perfect" body as everyone is different with how they are and what they like.

    As long as you are healthy and happy with yourself, that should be all that matters. Although it's never that simple.
     
  9. LinaT14

    LinaT14 Vertical

    Location:
    Texas
    Yeah. Should I call you out on this? Already mentioned that complex carbs are broken down into simple sugars, and the body uses glucose the most. Admittedly, beta glycosidic bonds are probably better for you, but the end process is the same. And, I never said complex carbs were evil. I merely stated repeatedly that I, for one, cannot make 50-60% of my diet carbohydrates. And I stated WHY. Several times you and I have both stated that not everyone can eat the same diet as you or me.

    This is probably a great topic for another thread, but the 'gluten-free' mania that is going on is fuelled by the fact that more and more of the general population is allergic in in varying amounts, to gluten, a protein fonud in wheat. Whole grains have unrefined flour, and are supposedly better for you because of high fiber content, but also have more gluten; which can cause allergic reactions and a whole host of other problems, of which do not exclude obesity. So, the obesity epidemic is a little more complex than what you've stated.

    Conversely, it's OKAY if people choose to eat meat to get the essential amino acids and other nutrients in this manner. Not everyone chooses to be vegan.

    Unfortunately, I have too many friends who have to take Lipitor or some other med to 'lower their cholesterol' to the perceived 'norm'. Some of these friends are sedentary, while others are extremely active, even more than myself and are still required by their doctors to take the meds. Nevermind that their grandparents who had high cholesterol, didn't exercise, or modify their diet from steak and potatoes, lived well into their 90's.

    Your balanced diet does NOT look like mine. I could not stay thin on a diet like yours. I do much better on a diet that is higher in protein, lower in carbs and less, still, of fat.

    Never said they were. At the risk of repeating myself again, it's TOO MANY carbs that's a bad thing.
     
  10. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    Call me out on what exactly?

    "End process" is an odd expression. It sounds like an oxymoron. The end result might be the same: glucose for energy. However, the process differs. Ingested glucose doesn't go through the same process as ingested starch, especially those of the likes of oatmeal. But I'll assume you know that. Even fat and protein are sources of glucose. I wouldn't consider all of these as having the same "end process," but they do have different processes and a similar result (assuming glucose being the result).

    Now we're getting into another topic yes. Personally, I'm more concerned about heart disease than gluten intolerance or allergies. Not everyone has celiac disease, and not all complex carbohydrates have gluten, or a lot of gluten. You know how much I love oatmeal (must be my Irish blood): okay for a gluten-free diet. You just have to be careful of contamination from other crops. There are several other options too.

    I know not everyone is going to be a vegan. Most people aren't going to be. Eating meat is okay depending on why you're eating it. If you want to justify eating it merely for the amino acids, that's not a very good argument. If you want to justify eating it because you like how it tastes, then sure.

    I don't know that much about cholesterol. It's not really something I think about. My point is that thin doesn't necessarily mean healthy, nor does overweight necessarily mean unhealthy. Though admittedly, dieting isn't necessarily about health. I imagine for some it's not.

    Well, then perhaps you aren't on a balanced diet. But perhaps you do what you do mainly to stay thin. I won't try to refute that. I will also assume you take health under consideration and make conscious food choices. It's just that you avoid an amount of carbohydrates many would consider a balanced level. On the flip side is my main point: complex carbohydrates aren't bad for you. Whether or not you have said so yourself, I want this to be clear.

    We both agree on this. There is, however, a difference between talking about thinness and talking about health.
     
  11. mixedmedia

    mixedmedia ...

    Location:
    Florida
    Too many empty carbs is a bad thing. I find it baffling that all this talk is going on conflating broccoli and oatmeal with white bread and mashed potatoes. I would like to see the data supporting the theory that people eating a moderate low-fat diet consisting of about 50-60% complex carbohydrates is making people fat or causing diabetes. I will guarantee you the numbers are low making those who fit that category exceptions to the rule. A moderate low-fat diet consisting of about 50-60% complex carbohydrates is ideal for most people. And before you start mentioning all the fat people and diabetics around, I'll just stress these words moderate, low-fat, complex carbohydrates. Most people are not eating this diet. Because most people want to eat too much and eat too much of the wrong things. It's not complicated.
     
  12. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    I want to point something out again. Even the American Diabetic Association recommends complex carbohydrates as a part of a diabetic's meal plan. They even suggest as high as 50% as a proportion for each meal. They also make suggestions of good carbohydrate choices (this includes whole grains, which they consider a "diabetes superfood"). They explicitly state 45 to 60 grams of carbohydrates at each meal as a starting point. Depending on your overall caloric intake, that could very well amount to around 50%. A chicken breast is approximately 27 g of protein and 3 g of fat. Do the math.
     
  13. mixedmedia

    mixedmedia ...

    Location:
    Florida
    A large part of the problem with diet in America is the amounts of food that we eat. What you see in restaurants as 'diet portions' of food are really all any of us need to eat. Exceptions being professional athletes and others who have above average energy needs. A chicken breast the size of a 'deck of cards' a cup of yellow/orange/dk. green vegetables and a cup of brown rice (or relative equivalents) is all anyone needs at any one meal. The average American eats 2-3x (or more!) of what they need to eat every day. This is a huge problem, no pun intended, because you have people accustomed to seeing an adequate diet as restrictive.

    My mother and stepfather have been eating this way for years. They split meals in restaurants and cook meals at home the size of which would be for one in an average home. They are in their late 60's-early 70's and they are very healthy. They are not stick thin, but, as you said Baraka, that is a totally different subject with its own associated problems for the American diet. They have weight where they are supposed to have weight. They have healthy circulatory systems and low LDL cholesterol and its relative healthy amounts of HDL cholesterol. They have healthy GI tracts. They are able to maintain an active lifestyle and do all the things they want to do. All the things that a healthy moderate diet, low in fat, high in complex carbs is known to do for the average person. Very few people maintain that kind of diet. So I tend not to listen to people who claim that their diet will make them fat. There's no way unless you have a thyroid issue or some other metabolic disorder that interferes with the body's normal chemical reactions.
     
  14. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    Thanks, mm. Now I went and looked at stats. Holy shit, the American diet is fucked up. The average American adds over 3 oz. of sugar to their diets every day (which is over 300 calories alone). Those "healthy" fruit yogurts can have as much as 6 tsp. of sugar in them. Since the time I was born, Americans on average are consuming 25% more calories. Fast food places, and even many "normal" restaurants, are filled with meals easily exceeding 1,000 calories.

    And people are worried about whole grains?
     
  15. Fangirl

    Fangirl Very Tilted

    Location:
    Arizona
    (You are such a good Canadian boy!)

    My grandpa lived until age 101 and I know from eating many breakfasts with him over my Ontario summers that he started every day of his life with a bowl of oatmeal. He also ate almost a half loaf of bread in the a.m. along with nearly a pot of tea then he went outside and was active (clearing brush, chopping wood, etc). or to his workshop (he built our cottages and the furniture within them) 'til lunch which always included stuff from the garden, then went back out until dinnertime. We ate vegetables & fruit from the garden including cabbage, lettuce, scallions, potatoes, green beans, cucumbers, I think chives and such and picked raspberries and rhubarb for our jams and tarts. The dinnertime meal did not include a lot of meat. 'Frank' started every day of his life by doing a series of stretches and if he couldn't work outside he walked 6-7 miles every day.
    He's been dead 17 years and never was one for fad anything, including diets. No fat on the man, just lean muscle. In general, I think he did exactly what was right for him to live a long age span. Its probably unnecessary to say but he never smoked nor did he drink.
    I'm totally on the oatmeal wagon. It is so satisfying! I'm not much of a cook but there's a wealth of ways to incorporate it (or sneak it) into various meals as well.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Charlatan

    Charlatan sous les pavés, la plage

    Location:
    Temasek
    Sounds like Frank is very atypical. Most people today aren't anywhere near as active as that and don't eat near as well.
     
  17. Fangirl

    Fangirl Very Tilted

    Location:
    Arizona
    I know. I think though he was representative of the eating mindset at the time with the exercise to an extreme.

    Frank (as he preferred to be called) certainly was atypical of now but pretty representative of a 100-year period when in some ways we lived better. In a nutshell he went from a 14-y.o. cook in a lumber camp in the Canadian west to a Sargent on the Toronto police force prior to his long 'retirement.' He ate hearty quite a lot because he burned it off with exercise. But no junk food, as it hadn't been invented yet.

    I can't help but think that adopting/adapting the lifestyle would produce what some people seem to strive for.

    Me, I'm too lazy. :rolleyes:
     
  18. Charlatan

    Charlatan sous les pavés, la plage

    Location:
    Temasek
    I think there is little question that if people were as active as Frank, they'd have a lot less weight to carry around (assuming they also cut out the junk food).