Boobs: What's the deal? (NSFW)

Yes, I view physical attraction as a requirement when considering a romantic partner. So sue me.

Breast are a distinctly feminine physical trait(unless you're Meatloaf in Fight Club), which is precisely why men like them.

 

No thanks. Just happy to point out that you're just as superficial as the women that you're criticizing. Glad that you accept that you're no better than they are.

 

Physical attraction is a universal requirement for all humans, while surgically, superficially altering your body is not. But nice try, jazzy.

 

Attraction is a requirement in a relationship, but I have known relationships (many) that aren't based on physical attraction.

(Though I will admit to being superficial, and physical attraction is important to me).

 

After reading the second half of this thread, this is all I can say:

 

Really? So if I find ONE exception I'm right? Or even a whole group? Or a bunch of groups?

Jesus, Eddie, it's like you don't even try. How about all the arranged marriage over the centuries? There wasn't necessarily any attraction there. Then there are all the couples that "stayed together for the kids". Physical attraction is no more a universal than any of the other crackpot things you've tried to declare. Like all boobs being sexualized in all cultures.

And the obvious fallacy is that you're rejecting women based on purely superficial reasons. There's nothing wrong with that, but its ironic that you're criticisizing women who alter their bodies for being superficial while you're being equally superficial. If you don't like it, that's fine, but don't act like you're somehow better than those women. You're not. At best, you're equivalently superficial. At worst, well, I'll let you draw your own conclusions.

Face it, Eddie, you're in a glass house with a bag of rocks. Or is that your head? I get confused.

 

*heads off to do a 69 with his wife cuz he lovers the pussy*

and she likes it so why wouldn't I..........oh,and to stay on topic.........I will play with her breasts

 

Just popping in here to ask an obvious question - What is the point of doing a 69 if only the female is giving? That is ignoring a seriously good opportunity to give her pleasure. I would gladly be on the giving end without getting anything back at all in a heartbeat.

 

Different angle. Nice view. Works the same for her too if she's in that position and receiving rather than giving. I believe this is technically called a 68: we'll get in a 69, but I'll have to owe you one.

/ Much rather be giving too, usually, but the different angle is nice sometimes.

 

That is a good point. I was thinking mainly of Eddie saying he did not do that in the first place when I typed that.

 

I still can't get over that--that after everything he doesn't even snack on the beaver.
I love guys who love to 'give'; makes me want--even more--to return the pleasure. YUM.

 

forget the intercourse.........oral it is baby...........nothing else beats it

IMO

 

I agree, Fly. That's why I've always been sort of puzzled on a practical level about guys that worry about penis size. There are plenty of other ways to pleasure a woman vaginally than with a penis. My very first bf, sandman61 taught me that. Fucking was fun yeah, but hours can be spent enjoying one another orally. I also found at that time and since that cannabis enhances (my) pleasure even more. It's never less than ecstasy to get and give good oral after copping a little buzz.
--- merged: Nov 26, 2011 8:57 PM ---
Sorry. I seemed to have wandered off-topic. Here's my intro pic to TFP 4.0 (2003) . There are if you look closely, boobs there. (Like many women, I hate my upper arms and though knew nothing about Photoshopping at the time, attempted to 'fix' one. I stopped before I got to the other, lol.)

 

You clearly don't understand the point of a penis.

 

But, this is a thread about boobs! What about nipples? Without them, boobs would be pointless!

 

I'm fairly certain I do understand the 'point' of a penis. I've gotten that point a number of times, in fact.
--- merged: Nov 26, 2011 9:47 PM ---

You have a point, GOD.

 

Damn, I LOLed.