Boobs: What's the deal? (NSFW)

Sorry, I disagree. Cows have udders. WOMEN have boobs.

 

Udderly preposterous

 

lets not get into a teat for tat argument here people...

 

I present to you: Science.

Turns out they aren't just useless bags of fat nor is their sexualization purely a cultural fad of the west - the nipples, at least, are part of the sexual experience.

 

I agree, every time I stimulate nipples my genitals respond.

 

If a body part is used in sex, it's going to be sexualized. I'm sure the mesoamerican men grabbed and sucked their fair share of titties back in those times. I think it's a huge assumption for you to say that women's breasts weren't sexualized in cultures where women were regularly topless in public. Breasts may not have been AS sexualized as they are in this day and age, but I'm sure they aroused the fellas back then in the same manner as they arouse us now.

 

You're welcome to your opinion, but when we have hard-and-fast fact, you're not welcome to pull your own facts directly from your ass. You say "huge assumption", I say "you can't look past your own cultural biases". How's about you look at, oh, Central African cultures that still exist where women rarely wear tops - breasts aren't sexualized there. Or you could jump across the Atlantic to the South American tribes that have the same clothing styles and the same lack of sexualization. Or head over to the islands between Australia and Asia. Same thing. There are places that it's too fucking hot to wear a top when you're a native. Most of those places have adopted topless women as the norm, only no one cares that they have boobs. It's a bare chest to them.

Or you could read "Mutiny on the Bounty" and learn the same lesson. The native guys simply didn't care that their women were topless. It didn't mean anything to them.

Face it, Eddie, you're wrong. And the more you squirm on this, the more I'm going to keep throwing facts at you to point out that you're wrong. You have your opinion - nothing else. You're welcome to it, but I'm certain I'll capture more agreements than you simply based on the presentation of facts to support my opinion. And your complete inability to do the same.

 

Smallish breast on an athletic body are my favorite

 

So, in these Central African and South American tribes there's no grabbing or sucking of the breasts during sex? No, I think you're dead wrong about that, jazz. I think all men in all cultures find it arousing to fondle their women's breasts during sex and therefore breasts have been sexualized.
--- merged: Nov 20, 2011 10:06 PM ---

Totally agree.

 

I know I'm supposed to just scroll by when someone behaves as you do Eddie but you are really wearing me down.
Let's not ever meet. EVER. I fear I may bop you right in that snide :ahem: avatar of yours.
Also, there is a very distinct difference between facts and 'what (you) think'.

Dear Lord, help Eddie to understand.

 

I have very fast reflexes.

By the way, I am stating what I think, just as jazz is stating what he thinks. But really, I think he and I must have different definitions of "sexualized." To me, when something has become sexualized that means it has sexual connotations and associations. And as I've tried to point out, breasts, in all cultures are used as fun bags during sex...therefore they are sexualized.

 

There would be no warning. None.

As the_jazz and others have pointed out to you repeatedly in various threads you need to cite specifics, often called 'sources.' He does that. You don't. 'Thinking' something is groovy but back it up with facts and cite the source.

It's coming across to me that you cannot wrap your head around the notion that any culture could not see breasts the way you do--as 'fun bags.'
Please just answer this: How do you Eddie, know that ALL cultures use breasts as 'fun bags' during sex?

 

Ok, Eddie, where's your proof? I've got literature galore and you've got... Well, your own unsupported opinion. Prove your point. Your talking about cultures you've never visited or studied. Show me some proof. Without that, it's clear that you're manufacturing your own facts again. And I'll continue to point out that they smell like shit because they're pulled out of your ass.

 

Seriously? A better question would be; how can a guy not play with breasts during sex? I don't think I need to quote some formal historian's text for people to know that guys diddle the fun bags during sex. It's just one of those cross-cultural constants.

 

Prove it. The guys on The Bounty didn't agree with you. Neither did the late 19th Century Belgians. You're claiming a universal constant - show us why I'm wrong.

Oh wait, you can't. Because your full of shit on this one.

 

Can you prove that men in meso american and whatever other tribes you mentioned didn't play with boobies during sex? Didn't think so. Let's just chalk this discussion up to people giving their opinions. No need to get all snippy.

 

Actually I can prove it. If you've read "Mutiny on The Bounty" you'd know that the Tahitians were confused by the English obsession with the topless Tahitian women. There are other historical records of early contact with very similar results.

So again, you're making up your own facts. Admit it.

 

But you couldn't find them? I suppose I should just take your word for it.

 

<exhale>
Dude, in some cultures anal sex is preferred to vaginal. Can you understand that? It's a 'birth control method.' Doggy-style man-woman sex does not lend itself easily to boobie-fondling, either.
You cannot be very old/well read is the best excuse I can come up with for your insistence that because YOU believe something it's gotta be right. That is magical thinking, found in small children and the mentally ill.
I wish I could get all the_jazz on you. He's got it covered, though.

 

Wow, just...wow. Doggie style sex is the best time for some boobie fondling. How can you not know this?