1. We've had very few donations over the year. I'm going to be short soon as some personal things are keeping me from putting up the money. If you have something small to contribute it's greatly appreciated. Please put your screen name as well so that I can give you credit. Click here: Donations
    Dismiss Notice

Occupy Wall Street

Discussion in 'Tilted Philosophy, Politics, and Economics' started by Willravel, Sep 25, 2011.

  1. roachboy

    roachboy Very Tilted

    there are lots of words i can think of for eddie's particular mode of trolling--what its "good for" is keeping us updated on the latest manifestations of right panic, the new and improved attempts from the reality-optional set to discredit the occupation. now we've moved into classically stupid conservative territory with the attempt to paint the people doing the occupation as a version of that old right-wing favorite, the limosine liberal, yet another version of that main conservative fantasy character, the Persecuting Other. and that, as much as anything else, shows why there is right panic: a total lack of imagination, an inability to do anything but cycle through the same tedious, stupid memes, etc.
     
  2. Eddie Getting Tilted

    Ok. How?

    Wait, OWS isn't about solutions, is it?
     
  3. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    I just don't understand. We clearly have a problem with corrupt capitalism in the U.S., but instead of conservatives focusing on the problem, they'd rather seek to "discredit" OWS by pointing out that there are members among the 99% who have above average net worth.

    Anyone with an Internet connection and any remote idea of demographics will have known for weeks that the 99% includes those who make more money than the average American. It was always the case—99% isn't a random number.

    So instead of focusing on the problem, conservatives (not all of them, mind you—some do some semblance of rationality) would rather distract from it by pointing out the obvious as some kind of indictment of hypocrisy.

    It's about political will. OWS is a mass demonstration. It has already revealed itself to be influential on a political level. For these demands to be fulfilled in any capacity, it will require putting enough pressure on the politicians that have the power to do it.

    This is how this sort of thing works.

    OWS isn't about taking care of business for itself. Its role is to influence those that do that kind of work.
     
  4. roachboy

    roachboy Very Tilted

    like i've been saying, the first hit taken outside of ows was taken by the right and it followed from the shift in terms of debate away from their fatuous language. the problem is that the internal language of the right is too rigid--seemingly---to allow for any real flexibility with that sort of drift. witness our pal eddie, who has nothing to say beyond repeating "i don't like them" over and over and over and over and over and over---the problem appears to be that the right has built itself into such a rigid discursive universe that any attempt to adapt to the effects ows is having would simply compound the problem and risk scattering the various factions of the ultra-right back under the political and intellectual rocks they've crawled out from under to join up with the republicans in their race to the extreme right. so they have little choice but to try to eddie the ows---say the same stupid shit over and over and over again, modulating it a little, doing it again, hoping something anything will work, walking away from previous disinformation etc.
     
  5. Eddie Getting Tilted

    I haven't done that. I've stated why I don't like the movement.
     
  6. roachboy

    roachboy Very Tilted

    not really, eddie. you've been grasping at straws, gathering questionable information and misreading it and repeating yourself. maybe you could---o i dunno---step up your game and try not to be so tedious?
     
  7. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    roachboy, that explains quite succinctly why many conservatives criticize the OWS movement: it's their own way of validating corrupt politics. Those who target OWS in these ways are fulfilling the role of corporatocratic apologists, whether it's intentional or not. In the cases where it is intentional, it represents a rather sorry case of hypocrisy, considering most conservatives are always going on about intrusive government, big government, the nanny state, blah, blah, blah. It's this current system of federal government and its corporate courtiers that conflict with this core conservative ideology.

    You'd think more conservatives would be on board with holding Wall Street to account, with reinforcing a more balanced representative democracy within the political system, rather than covering up the soft authoritarianism bought and paid for by corporate interests.

    You'd think more conservatives would be gravely concerned about the state of democracy/liberty in America.

    But no, it always comes down to the individual, and so long as individual conservatives feel they're doing all right on a material level, whether or not the system is broken doesn't really matter.

    I don't think conservatives value democratic integrity as much as the conditions of their materialistic existence.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. roachboy

    roachboy Very Tilted

    another distinctive feature of populist conservative discourse is the systematic conflation of the particular interests of populist conservatism with that of "americans" in general. that's also come undone. this is a another problem. in populist conservative discourse, liberty is synonym for conservative power, freedom a synonym for a situation dominated by conservative thinking, be it economic or social or political. we've seen this over and over and over again. now the conservative disinformation system is repeating the same moves with respect to ows. it doesn't matter what the adversary of the particular interests of conservatives are--they're all the same.
     
  9. redux

    redux Very Tilted

    Location:
    Foggy Bottom
    Initally, the characterization from our friends here on the right (and their taking heads across the net) was that it was a bunch of unemployed lazy bums with nothing to do between collecting their unemployment checks.

    Then it was the corrupt unions trying to expand their power base.

    Now its the bored and frivolous young and upscale elitists in NYC.

    In fact, it is all of the above - the unemployed, blue collar union workers, young white collar professionals, members of the military, senior citizens -- people of all races, ages and economic backgrounds.

    I did get a laugh out of Eddie's slanted article (originally from Tucker Carlson's The Daily Caller and reprinted by Yahoo) and the comparison of housing prices of those arrested in NYC, the most expensive city in the country, with median housing prices in the US....or the median monthly rent of $1,850. Hell, I thought that was cheap for NYC - my daughter in college in NYC (the uber liberal Eugene Lang College) pays more for a 4th floor walk up in Brooklyn; she also has two roommates.

    Just more of the same from the right.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. pan6467

    pan6467 a triangle in a circular world.

    You really want to go there? You seriously want to discuss taxes and how taxing the rich sends jobs overseas? THAT IS the problem but you have it fucking bassackwards.

    IF you want lower taxes you don't send jobs overseas, you CREATE jobs at home by building factories and employing workers here. By sending jobs overseas you are destroying the tax base. No manufacturing taxes, no payroll taxes..... may sound great to you because that means more fucking profit, BUT the fact is, without those taxes and a solid foundation and tax base, there's only ONE group that CAN pay taxes and they are doing it to themselves. Are you really that fucking stupid that you don't understand this? Eventually, you ship enough jobs overseas, you have no one here to buy anything at all. We are already close to that level.

    So by all means, keep bitching about taxing the "rich" while they slit their own throats for profit. Hmmmm, if I ship jobs overseas and save 10million on taxes and 30 million on payroll and benefits I can pocket all that and go ahead tax me on the 40 million I just made in profit, I'm still paying LESS and making more... ha ha ha but here's the kicker, I'll get charismatic speakers who want gated community houses and G2 jets and a lifetime supply of oxys to convince the idiots out there that I pay too much in taxes.

    Hey Zeus Fricking Crisps, are you TRULY that stupid? I don't want to believe you are, you at times make solid points but when you talk about taxing the rich you are just fucking blinded by hatred and BS to see you are being played.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Bodkin van Horn

    Bodkin van Horn One of the Four Horsewomyn of the Fempocalypse



    This reminds me of how the whole civil rights movement was discredited by the fact that white people participated too. Wait. That's dumb.
     
  12. redux

    redux Very Tilted

    Location:
    Foggy Bottom
    A new poll reported by CNN is trending much like nearly every recent poll. As more Americans become more aware of OWS, support has risen as well.

    Unlike the Tea Party, support of which continue to decline (or negative opinion continues to rise)
     
  13. pan6467

    pan6467 a triangle in a circular world.

    I would temper my pointing to polls for support. The more people hear of Molotov cocktails and chairs flying and get wind that closing ports will increase store prices thus helping the rich even more, those polls will shift very swiftly.

    The OWS HAS to follow the laws. They HAVE to or their support will diminish because the right (and rightfully so) will show the hypocrisy. That will be the death nail to the OWS and they will have gained nothing and in fact will have lost more than they started with. The more I see and read about the occupy movements in SOME cities, the more I wonder if they even know what they are doing and the conspiracist in me has to ask, are they actually trying to sabotage the message by acting all stupid.

    I cannot nor will EVER support people who put themselves above the law and or use violence to convey political/social or economic messages.

    The OWS crowd did not have a bigger more loyal supporter than myself and now I'm scratching my head wondering if that support has been fool hardy as I watch people bitch that cities are following their laws and holding inspections and confiscating things that the protesters truly don't need to protest. It's becoming too far left and I don't think the moderates that YOU OWS people need to win the elections and truly change things, will support your cause/candidates, if you keep moving LEFT.

    IF you want to change the way things are, you look to Ghandi, MLK Jr., Jesus Christ, and so on. You do not win over the people by becoming what your enemies say you are. There is no excuse for it. You want to point to how the TP is gaining negative appeal, so shall the OWS if reports of violence and shops having to close down and people losing jobs keeps coming out.

    With violence you become no better than the very people you are fighting against. You in fact become worse than them, because they use you as a reason to NOT change and the people supportive of you don't want to be affiliated with violence and extremism.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. roachboy

    roachboy Very Tilted

    so far ows has been assiduous about using non-violence. there's been a media context created that makes of that the theater of non-violence. they've been attacked repeatedly by police in various cities--when those attacks pass into the media streams, the police loose (witness the events in oakland over the past few days which saw the oakland police and mayor trying to throw each other under the bus over police violence). the non-violence is a fundamental aspect of the tahrir model that's been adapted. it's the basis for the moral force of the arguments.

    btw: consider pulling your money out of b of a or citi or wells fargo or any other bigger bank before the 5th and putting it in a credit union or smaller bank in solidarity with the occupation movement.
     
  15. roachboy

    roachboy Very Tilted

  16. redux

    redux Very Tilted

    Location:
    Foggy Bottom
    Mother Jones has a map of OWS sites w/notations on arrests. Most involved non-violent passive resistance.

    An example from Des Moines, IA (click on any blue dot)
    About three dozen protesters who are part of the "Occupy Wall Street" movement were arrested for trespassing and taken to the Polk County Jail late Sunday after they refused to leave a park west of the Iowa Capitol when it closed at 11 p.m. Several people were dragged on the ground or carried away in handcuffs by state troopers, after they linked arms and huddled together in an effort to avoid arrest.​

    Yes, one could say they were breaking the law, much like Ghandi, MLK Jr, etc.

    http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-protest-map
     
  17. Joniemack

    Joniemack Beta brainwaves in session

    Location:
    Reading, UK
    Eddie says:
    Second highest.

    But they end up paying far less than the 35% thanks to tax breaks, subsidies, and loopholes.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/03/business/economy/03rates.html
    Unfair advantages are the problem. Enter OWS.
     
  18. Eddie Getting Tilted

    So how do we encourage or motivate these American corporations to move the millions of out-sourced jobs back to the U.S.? By making them pay more taxes? That's not exactly an incentive. Why would a company employ American workers that cost them 30-70% more than in India, China or the Philippines?
     
  19. Derwood

    Derwood Slightly Tilted

    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Rich white kids are at OWS for the party atmosphere? Next thing you're going to tell me is that some Dead Heads went to concerts just for the drugs!
     
  20. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    This indicates that a 35% tax rate doesn't necessarily mean 35% paid:

     
    • Like Like x 1