1. We've had very few donations over the year. I'm going to be short soon as some personal things are keeping me from putting up the money. If you have something small to contribute it's greatly appreciated. Please put your screen name as well so that I can give you credit. Click here: Donations
    Dismiss Notice

Politics The Elephant in the room...The GOP today

Discussion in 'Tilted Philosophy, Politics, and Economics' started by rogue49, Aug 28, 2012.

  1. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    I hear some Dems may have fucked with the primary Cantor lost in,
    because in Virginia anyone can vote in a primary.
    Meaning an organized "get out the vote" effort to mess up Cantor's day...and vote for his opponent instead.

    So he may have been hit on both sides, Right & Left...enough to make a big difference.
    This is being claimed by Cantor's pollster.

    And if it did...oh well, live by the sword, die by the sword.
    If the rules say you can do it...I think Cantor was familiar with that technique in Congress.
     
  2. Street Pattern

    Street Pattern Very Tilted

    This has been debunked. Cantor's pollster is trying to make excuses for his failure.

    Eric Cantor Pollster Blames Democrats. He's Wrong - Business Insider
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/12/upshot/did-democratic-voters-defeat-eric-cantor-probably-not.html
    Eric Cantor's loss: Plenty of theories, but what does the data say? - CBS News

    In real life, only a small percentage of Americans are willing to vote strategically for candidates they don't really support.

    Cantor lost by a wide margin, and he lost all over the district.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2014
  3. ASU2003

    ASU2003 Very Tilted

    Location:
    Where ever I roam
    I am starting to see more 'liberal' Catholics around here. People concerned about poverty, pollution, and treatment of immigrants. If the Democrats would start pushing a ground game that tells people what they would do on these issues instead of begging for money, I think it would work out great. If you wanted to go negative and attack the Tea Party, just list all of the things they are 'for' and the damage it would do to the country.

    This shouldn't be even close. Where is the explanation from economists on how the economy works, why immigrants aren't a bad thing in the long run, and what life is like for the average person who is undocumented. Then go into ways that Mexico and other Central American countries should improve themselves... That is how the problem should be solved long term.

    I don't think the Dems organized a strike on Cantor, but I wouldn't be surprised if 3-4% of the loss was attributed to the Left. For some reason the Democrats don't like having primaries against the Green party and instead choose to split the vote in the general election... The primaries are boring if you are a Democrat, so it doesn't get their ideas out there, they aren't in the news, and nobody is talking about them.
     
  4. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    Cantor didn't need to move right. He needed to get real.

    I believe you are correct @StreetPattern , the pollster is mostly just in CYA mode...and if any Dems did vote like that, it was small potatoes.

    I think the article sums up what was really wrong...Cantor was the equivalent of Al Gore in personality, he was a Wonk.
    He forgot how to speak TWO languages...which is needed these days in Fed govt politics.
    Wonk inside the beltway, casual outside. (Biden is a good example of the 2nd, although he gets in trouble with the 1st - basically the opposite)

    He was a stiff, it was about posturing his agenda inside the beltway...forgetting not just just be present in his locale, but "connecting" too.
    I saw his posters and otherwise as I traveled through the VA countryside...I noted them, but they weren't noticeable.
    But then again, I didn't see ANY of his opponent's...so what does that say to you??
    Is it name recognition? Or that he didn't put out his effort that way...

    I think what made the difference was Cantor went through the paces, the standard process...but he didn't connect or listen.
    The other guy, sounds like he drove to "get out the vote", get his supporters to the stations...and inspire other angry voters to vote against Cantor.

    That's just my take...it could be many factors, all of the above.
    The real interesting thing now to me, is the cascading impact...not just direct, but for the whole national environ.
    Chaos Theory in action.
     
  5. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    Sorry, I have to call "bullshit" here...not on the author, but on the GOP.
    The author gets it spot on.
    The president (any of them) are doing more because the Congress is not doing it's job. (with the GOP not compromising)
    And it's not going to get any better.

    Frankly, I don't even think they're doing the lawsuit to win...just to stall and prevent Obama from doing anything during it.
    So not "only" will Congress be stagnant...but they will prevent even the Executive Office and underlying departments from acting.

    And their "excuse" of Obama overstepping his powers is serious bullshit too
    ...because it's shown that he's done WAY less "executive actions" than other presidents.
    Less vetos...less executive orders...and so on.

    It's the ultimate game play in their War of Attrition.
    This is just a continuation of their tantrum.

    I wonder if this is not only a way to get their way...and shut Obama down, (get Obama!!)
    but also to undermine the Federal Government as a whole, keeping with their "govt is evil" theme???
    Stupid is as stupid does.
    Definition of insanity right here. :mad:

    The only problem is the American public is not paying attention to the details...or blame everyone for their frustrations.
    And the GOP base is a lot more active then anything the Dems are putting out.
    Voters don't vote the "instigators" out, they just vote to what they hear in ads in their local areas.
    It's only going to get worse.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2014
    • Like Like x 1
  6. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    As a followup...the legal experts are already throwing their hat in on the legitimacy of this move.

    There's another reason...this would upset the distinction and balance of the separation of powers in the Constitution.
    If you allow this precident, you'd end up constantly have one branch deciding on suits from another branch over another.
    Not just Congress vs. President (legislative vs. executive), but vice versa...(executive against legislative)
    Or even worse...parts of each, going after another.

    The US Constitution strictly states how one can supersede or check the other.
    This would effectively be M.A.D.
    One nuke triggers following nukes...to political Armageddon or nothing left to work on or move forward.

    The exaggeration that the GOP is saying vs. Obama is obnoxious..."King-like authority"???
    This is why I do NOT like the current GOP. (despite my centrist values or beliefs which includes some Right principles)
    They are disgusting.
    There is nothing they will not say or do to get what they want...other than what they CYA for. (so no publically open "N" words thrown out...yet)

    You want my vote...make me respect you again.
    Unlike other American voters...I see what you did there. (I see it again & again...)
    And it is disturbing.

    STOP being the screaming logjam that prevents the US from doing things.
    Compromise is not weakness.
    It is human...and how humans work with other humans.
    If even just TWO people in a relationship, who love each other, have to communicate and compromise...what makes you think you're different???

    Right now, all you're doing is constantly sticking a gun in the face of that opposite you.
    Saying, give me what I want...or else.

    Thank God, the GOP is a piss-poor shot.
    And shoot themselves in the foot quite often.
    (they're like fucking "Muerte" in Undercover Blues :rolleyes: )
     
    • Like Like x 2
  7. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    Can the G.O.P. Be a Party of Ideas?

    This article is quite interesting...
    And actually, if the GOP can pull this off...and are discussing it sincerely, then it will be their saving grace and make them interesting again.

    But right now, I think they created a Frankenstein in the Tea Party and their base...unintended consequences, they've lost control.
    The inmates are ruling the asylum at the moment...and are voting for more chaos and anarchy based off of their old spin, memes and talking points.
    They created the mindset and mantras...and now they're getting backlash from it...from their own masses.
     
  8. ASU2003

    ASU2003 Very Tilted

    Location:
    Where ever I roam
    The GOP is breaking up into different factions within the same party. Ron Paul and the libertarians (anti tax, pro money, pro pot, don't care about social causes) are getting some people to vote with them, who should be getting picked up by the Democrats. And the social extremists should be distancing themselves from the religious mainstream and letting the Democrats win back more of the moderates by promoting helping the poor, healthcare, and peace.

    It isn't just the Democrats that aren't doing enough to build support and have a cohesive plan. But some of the groups in the far left cities are doing stuff that hurts them in the midwest/south. And then the right wing media just spins it and causes people whose lives would be improved with better laws and programs look at them as the problem, but blame others instead of helping.
     
  9. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    Sorry, I just had to post it...although it is a good analogy of some attitudes in the party at the moment.
    (** I've heard it with my own ears...honestly)

    What are people's real agendas??

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2014
    • Like Like x 1
  10. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    Ok, I agree with this...it is setting a precedent that won't ever stop.
    Mixing up the separation of powers/branches...Executive, Legislative and Judicial.

    It would be effectively shutting down the Executive branch...not just Obama's, but every other president following. (no matter what party)
    And it would have Legislative asking Judicial to question everything...and set standard.

    Even more so, SCOTUS would be at constant work on what is basically politics...not evaluating Constitutional level legal cases.
    They've got more than enough to keep themselves occupied now.

    The GOP is going overboard and potentially damaging the government structure of the U.S.
    (which is why it's in this thread...)
    It this just "gotcha"? Or a way for the ultra-libertarian ideology to finally destroy the Federal govt?? :eek:

     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2014
  11. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    When Glenn Beck becomes the voice of compassion and moderation...there's something not so hot going on.
    Geez :rolleyes:

    WWJD? (and I'm Jewish...)
     
    • Like Like x 2
  12. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    Actually I agree with Rand Paul in this topic. (no guarantee on others...)

    The US needs to pull back on it's involvement in other countries...in the matter of continuing subsidies and military intervention.
    Sure we can deal with a shorter-term crisis, but having to have lengthy unending sorties and supporting governments is too much.
    And it seems that Obama is following this path, restraint. (What a concept) Using alternative methods of solution. And they seem to work too.

    Here you see the neo-cons and hawks wanting to jump into everything.
    God knows how many wars and military actions we'd be in if McCain had won. (he insists on attacking everything)
    And we've seen what Cheney's policies have done.

    I don't mind using force, I don't mind using the US military or strength.
    But we can't be everywhere and everytime and forever...we are not God. (or at least playing Civilization)
    And there is some responsibility for countries to support themselves and others to assist too more often.

    Problem is, this is done on the backs of American taxpayers...where we could use the money elsewhere for our benefit or not take it in the first place.
    Ironic, that the people who constantly harp that we are big government, that we have too many taxes, that we have too big a deficit
    are the SAME that are insisting that Americans spend TRILLIONS on intervention everywhere. (literal and with no exaggerations, Trillions in total)

    This shit ain't cheap.
    We've got better things to do.

     
  13. Street Pattern

    Street Pattern Very Tilted

    The Republican establishment is trying to shut down Rand Paul, not just because they are opposed to his foreign policy views, but because, if he's nominated, they expect him to lose by a landslide.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    As opposed to who else do they have??
    At least he'd be able to harness the Libertarian side of American, which actually straddles both Dems & GOP and Independents.

    Romney again?? Jeb Bush? Rubio? Christie?
    All of these have serious weaknesses.

    In truth, I think they're scared of him because they think they couldn't control him
    and he might upset the very lucrative military-industrial complex...and other Federal boondoggles.

    I'm not joking when I say, living in the Greater DC Metro Area, "The money doesn't fall far from the well..."

    He'd tear up all the contracts...and there's a side to me that likes that idea. (even though there'd be repercussions, even on my industry & career)
     
  15. Aceventura

    Aceventura Slightly Tilted

    Location:
    North Carolina
    Lose to Clinton? The woman who defended a rapist of a teen who she knew was guilty???? Then joked about it???? What does she stand for???? Do you trust her? How can you possibly trust her after this came to light? She will obviously do or say anything. I don't want to hear about how she was forced - I would give up my law license under those circumstances rather than defend a guilty rapist of a teen - or I would make sure he went to jail.
     
  16. Street Pattern

    Street Pattern Very Tilted

    So criminal defendants charged with rape should not get legal representation?

    You have a law license, and wrote this?
     
  17. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
  18. redravin

    redravin Cynical Optimist Donor

    Location:
    North
    Not to be pedantic but isn't the guiding principal of American justice that every person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law?
    Also that every person is entitled to the best possible defense and that it's the states job to prove the person's guilt.
    A lawyer is not guilty of the crimes of their clients (well, some mob attorneys seem to be criminals but that's another story).
    Any lawyer who would make sure that their client went to jail should be put in jail themselves.
    As Blackstone said " It is better that ten guilty men go free than one innocent suffer. "
     
    • Like Like x 2
  19. Aceventura

    Aceventura Slightly Tilted

    Location:
    North Carolina
    Having legal representation is different from making a mockery of justice. Perhaps there is a reason I am not a lawyer or politician, but if I represented someone who was guilty I would not exploit minor human errors so that a guilty person would go free - would you?

    I wrote in a hypothetical context. Right now, I know I could never trust Hillery Clinton if she were President - it is possible she will never be President, but I know what my reaction will be.
    --- merged: Jul 16, 2014 at 10:46 AM ---
    At the very least she violated her code of ethics by violating attorney client confidentiality - why would she do this? Many defense lawyers say that they will never discuss the true guilt or innocence with their client. Either way, it comes down to an issue of trust with me. At one point I thought Ms. Clinton was trustworthy, now I don't. If I am the only one with my view, it won't matter.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 23, 2014
  20. Derwood

    Derwood Slightly Tilted

    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Paul won't get the nomination. The GOP political machine will make sure of it