1. We've had very few donations over the year. I'm going to be short soon as some personal things are keeping me from putting up the money. If you have something small to contribute it's greatly appreciated. Please put your screen name as well so that I can give you credit. Click here: Donations
    Dismiss Notice

Sex 2.0? Are we becoming more enlightened?

Discussion in 'Tilted Life and Sexuality' started by clarksdale, Apr 10, 2014.

  1. Chris Noyb

    Chris Noyb Get in, buckle up, hang on, & be quiet.

    Location:
    Large City, TX
    I find it strange that some people I know have accepted, only to a certain extent, gay relationships (usually because someone they care about has stepped out of the closet), but dig in their heels when it comes to legally recognizing same sex partnerships/unions.

    We've come a long way in studying sex and giving names to wide variety of sexual acts that have always existed, but weren't studied and labelled. Acknowledgement doesn't equal acceptance. There are many people who believe that once you open the door to certain sexual activities as acceptable, the door is also open for unacceptable sexual activities.

    Because we all have different definitions of acceptable & unacceptable, the battle continues. Some people will oppose anything that doesn't fit their idea of normal, others will promote activities that very few people consider normal.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    After humans being around for so long and having so many of us.
    If you can think of it, it's been done.
    And even many things you cannot think about...

    AND more than likely, a society has adopted a tradition or habit around it too...
    Just because you're not used to it...doesn't mean others haven't.
     
  3. HoBuupeek

    HoBuupeek New Member

    @rogue49: Your advice is greatly appreciated. I'm the kind of guy, that likes to play by the rules of the particular sandlot I've been invited to. EeeGADs! I've even made up a few of my own from time to time!
     
  4. the_jazz

    the_jazz Accused old lady puncher

    Personally, I think that "tolerance" and "manners" are two mutually exclusive things.

    "Tolerance" could mean thinking "wow, he looks gay/she's dressed slutty/whatever" then moving on with your day with no further energy expended. You can tolerate the variations that other folks throw at you. It's when you step outside that internal monologue to give it voice that things start to be problematic. Commenting on or confronting someone about their appearance (or whatever) is simply bad manners and starts edge into the inverse of tolerance - intolerance, where you can't stand to be confronted by the different. Thing is that I don't think that there's been any more or less of this over the years, in spite of what some people would have you believe. All I have to do is look back in history at the lynchings in the South, Oscar Wilde, Matthew Sheppard, etc. to see people move from tolerance to bad manners to intolerance.

    There's another level - "acceptance" - that basically means you don't care about what others do so long as it doesn't affect you. The growth of that concept - if it is even possible to have it grow (there's your enlightenment, @Herculite) - is the point of this thread in my mind. Unfortunately, I think that there are simply more people that accept or tolerate the different that are willing to give voice to their viewpoint. I don't think that there are any more or less of them but for the last 40 years or so they've been louder. Perhaps they'll convince more people to tolerate the different and use good manners. If that happens, perhaps the next generation will have more folks who truly accept others.
     
    • Like Like x 3

  5. I was about ready to comment on how one can have good manners and tolerate the lifestyles of another (which I tend to think are the same thing), but then you brought up that third level of 'acceptance' and it rendered my comment irrelevant.

    Acceptance is definitely something that I'd like to see more of, but in lieu of that (being more realistic) being simply tolerant is a step in the right direction.

    ...

    Also, I dunno about y'all, but I've definitely heard cases of guys being called (and, actually, myself being called) a 'slut'. It does happen, it just doesn't happen as often or as openly.
     
  6. clarksdale

    clarksdale Vertical

    Location:
    Minnesota
    "Tolerance" and "acceptance" are both kind of passive, though. I'd like to see a more enlightened society actually see sexuality as a positive and healthy part of human life, in all of its glorious flavors and colors and designs.

    We just watched both parts of the Lars Von Trier movie "Nymphomaniac." There is a scene in it where Joe is at a group therapy session for female "sex addicts" I guess. She remembers herself as a young girl experiencing her first orgasm and experiencing her sexuality with delight. She stands up and tells the group that she loves herself and her lustful ways. (If you've seen the movie, you know that she isn't exactly a model of non-hung up sex positivity...but it is still interesting, including the speech at the very end where the man she's been telling her story to has an interpretation of her life as one which would have been seen/read quite differently if she'd been male.)

    We have a great boutique sex shop in my city which always makes us smile when we go in. The people who work there are just joyful about sex and cater to those of us who love sex and we all want to make it as interesting and fun as possible. So my initial question was, I guess, is the population at large getting more cool about sex? Not just tolerating people they think are "queer" or "sluts" but living sexually with intention in the daylight, if you know what I mean. Because I feel like my wife and I are, and our marriage and our life in general is better for it.
     
  7. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    I'd like sex to get to the point that it just is.

    I wonder if the other more "enlightened" countries are truly are as implied. (or is it just a myth?)
    And if the US can get to that state.

    I've seen it first-hand something like it, where in Cartagena, Columbia, no one was shy about a Statue of Liberty sized statue,
    out in the middle of the city, an Indian beauty with jutting bare breasts.
    There's no way you could get away with that in the US.
    Or slight difference in strip joints and massage parlors in Canada. (not that I was ready for that level yet, I just couldn't get it through my head)
    Or on TV...or legal sexworkers...or Sex Shops that are just out in the open (mostly they're kind of shuttered)
    But I truly wonder?

    Why is violence more accepted, than sex? Pain more than pleasure?
    Life is short...
     
  8. Herculite

    Herculite Very Tilted

    I was in my first fight long before my first BJ.

    My son is all about war and combat right now, but sex isn't even something on his radar. Such is evolution.
     
  9. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    Ahh...maybe I'm weird.
    I was playing "doctor", way before my first fight. (or even a simple bully)

    I remember seeing a "sexual" movie in my memory around 4 or 5
    First Doctor session was around 6
    Noticing the stripper in Saturday Night Fever around 9
    First bully was around 10
    Second Doctor session with another "patient" around 11
    First fight was around 12 (I lost with a punch to the nose)

    Personally, I like my ratios of sex to fight
    Unfortunately, this turned around for some years between 12 to 18
    Not that many "patients" again until I was 18.
    Lots of "research articles" though. ;)
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2014
  10. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    Violence isn't always detached from sexuality. You could say a lot of it extends from sexual competition (or simply competitiveness).

    As for sex itself: sources of power have been attempting to control it for millennia. Sexual liberation in the '60s (or whenever) was the biggest shift for women's sexuality since the loss of estrus.

    Gay liberation has had a similar impact.

    All this has been a democratization of sex that is only threatened by reactionaries.
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2014
  11. OtherSyde

    OtherSyde Slightly Tilted

    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    "Everything is about sex. Except sex. Sex is about power." -Kevin Spacey, House of Cards
    .
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. girldetective

    girldetective Getting Tilted

    Yes, I believe americans are becoming more intentional in their sexuality. Sex shops are thriving, and not your old swampy dark corner holes. New ones with clever names are popping up daily on Main St, especially in our large urban centers. Interiors feature cool graphics and often there are classes held on how to use ropes and other sex toys that they sell. Our streets have boxes of various cool zines free for the taking, with fun ads for these stores and stories on how to steam it all up, as well as other political, social local news. If you dont happen to live in one of the hipster communities, you can be enlightened in an hour on the internet, and have toys shipped directly to your house in 24 hours. If you have a cell phone, you can stand on a street corner or sit on your couch and locate someone nearby who might want to get sassy with you in just the right way, maybe within feet of where you are and looking for the same right now!

    Is the population at large getting more cool about sex? Im not sure.
     
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2014
  13. OtherSyde

    OtherSyde Slightly Tilted

    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Yeah, Lovers sex shop was HUGE when I was up in Seattle, they had several in Seattle and one in almost every surrounding smaller township... I don't know how much they've expanded since then.
     
  14. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    How about sex is about sex...and nothing else.

    Frankly, it shouldn't even be about romance & love.
    Why? Because you should be able to separate them.
    Romance & love can happen without sex.
    Romance & love can continue after sex wanes... (then may surge again...wane, wax, wane, wax...it changes)
    And
    Sex can happen without romance & love, just pure passion.
    Sex can happen when romance & love fades.

    One is not the other.
    Now it's incredible & wonderful when they mix...but they shouldn't be dependent on each other.
    People actually get into trouble when they mix the two up.

    You need to know in truth, which is which.
    Which is easier said than done for many of us. (including myself)

    I wonder, if men & women, had holodecks or sex robots, at any time...and used those without shame or guilt anytime.
    Would they be more free to express romance & love without the tension of sex underlying it?
    Or even better, would the sex with the person you were in love with be even better, because you were comfortable and practiced.

    I know my sense of emotion is more in check, yet more sure now, than when I was younger.
    So I'm clicking with the woman in question, more for my connection with her and who she is...than any "need".
    I'm hoping the same is true on the other side too...because I want her to want me for me...not just my sex.

    Sex is an enjoyment. An act, simple.
    Power, Romance, Love and otherwise are totally different things.