1. We've had very few donations over the year. I'm going to be short soon as some personal things are keeping me from putting up the money. If you have something small to contribute it's greatly appreciated. Please put your screen name as well so that I can give you credit. Click here: Donations
    Dismiss Notice

I seem to notice two main sexual types.

Discussion in 'Tilted Life and Sexuality' started by XavierBreth, Nov 7, 2013.

  1. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    Now that I think of it, sex isn't really a sport either. Sports usually have a contrived competitive element to it, and "winning" is usually rewarded based on relatively arbitrary measures. It's too artificial.

    I think I'd rather liken sex to a quest.

    Questfucking.

    Epic.

    I'm like the Galahad of sex. I'm going to find the Holy Grail, even if I can't bring it back with me. (Look, it's my duty as a knight to sample as much peril as I can.)
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2013
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Plan9

    Plan9 Rock 'n Roll

    Location:
    Earth
    MUST... NOT... TOUCH... THIS.
     
  3. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Plan9

    Plan9 Rock 'n Roll

    Location:
    Earth
    Dude, I almost got banned. You don't even know.

    I like your new terminology, though.

    The joy of adventure.
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2013
  5. mixedmedia

    mixedmedia ...

    Location:
    Florida
    I like questfucker. I may assume that moniker myself. Adventuress!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    Be careful. I have a heroine/adventuress fetish.
     
  7. mixedmedia

    mixedmedia ...

    Location:
    Florida
    I take appropriate care. Besides, you're one of the betrothed (essentially). I do have some standards.
    --- merged: Nov 25, 2013 at 11:47 AM ---
    Strike that, reword it. You are well within my standards, but outside my limitations.
    That's better. :)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 2, 2013
    • Like Like x 2
  8. Lindy

    Lindy Moderator Staff Member

    Location:
    Nebraska
    Well, sex may not be art, but artifice can often lead to sex.;)
    Is sportfucking the same as the casual meaningless sex discussed in another thread? I think that sportfucking is mostly in the purview of the male gender, and like sporthunting involves seeking, conquest, the skill of the act itself, as well as bragging rights (see Tim above) and possibly the public display of trophies.

    But not exclusively male. I did know one woman who was out hustling for a couple of weeks because she wanted to have been with thirty different guys by her thirtieth birthday, and was afraid that she might have counted one guy twice.:p

    If I got to pick my nose, I would've picked a smaller one.:rolleyes:

    Agreed, the commonplace cannot, by definition, be a miracle. But (since 'tis that season) if a virgin birth were to occur, then it would be a miracle, would it not?

    And for me, a strong emotional connection does just that. The connection makes the coupling greater than the sum of its parts.
    --- merged: Nov 25, 2013 at 12:16 PM ---
    I like your idea of the victorious artificially arbitrary orgasm.
    I saw.
    I conquered.
    I came.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 2, 2013
    • Like Like x 1
  9. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    I got to remember that.
    Great bumper-sticker. :cool:
     
  10. Chris Noyb

    Chris Noyb Get in, buckle up, hang on, & be quiet.

    Location:
    Large City, TX
    My button has been pushed, rant on.

    We all want sex to be great every time. It isn't great every time.

    Of course it's natural to compare partners. The problems are judging partners by a standard set by 'better' partners, and having high expectations, can lead to disappointment. A great partner might not be great everytime. A partner that was disappointing might turn out to be great at times.

    If the sex doesn't meet your standards and/or expectations, remember that you're one of the partners, and (while it doesn't always hold true) you get out of it what you put into it.

    Rant off.
     
  11. mixedmedia

    mixedmedia ...

    Location:
    Florida
    I have had partners who are very experienced and take me into hand and I've had partners who were not very experienced who I've had to coach a little. Both are very, very pleasant. So I will qualify it this way, there are men who don't have a knack for partnering with me. I partner best with men who have a dominant streak. So, I will give you that someone that I don't think is 'good in bed' may just not be my type. But I don't think I am obligated to make it work when it's just a bad match, though.

    That said, I have been with a few men who were just inept. It's not my responsibility to help them, either. It's recreation not a public service.
     
  12. Chris Noyb

    Chris Noyb Get in, buckle up, hang on, & be quiet.

    Location:
    Large City, TX
    Recognizing incompatability is a good thing. Mismatchs happen, what one person wants might be something the other person can't deliver. How much coaching someone is willing to provide is an individual decision. Ineptness, by my definition, wouldn't be just inexperience, it would an unwillingness, maybe an inability for some, to make an effort to improve things.

    My rant was in response to a post in this thread that seemed slanted toward blaming the partners who were judged to be sub-standard. I might have misunderstood, it isn't the first time and it won't be the last time. As the cliche goes, it takes two to tango.