1. We've had very few donations over the year. I'm going to be short soon as some personal things are keeping me from putting up the money. If you have something small to contribute it's greatly appreciated. Please put your screen name as well so that I can give you credit. Click here: Donations
    Dismiss Notice

The atheist mom hero

Discussion in 'General Discussions' started by warrrreagl, May 25, 2013.

  1. warrrreagl

    warrrreagl Slightly Tilted

    Location:
    Land of cotton.
    By now, I'm assuming everybody has seen that famous video of the atheist woman in Oklahoma refusing Wolf Blitzer's pandering for her to thank God for her survival.

    That video is really on my mind a lot lately due to an incident at my high school alma mater. For as long as that high school has been standing, there has been a baccalaureate service in the auditorium on the Sunday afternoon prior to graduation. At the time of my graduation in the late 70's, attendance was mandatory, but there were only two religious-themed moments - the opening and closing prayers. The rest of the time was like an honors assembly for seniors and their families, complete with awards, speeches, and LOTS of music. For a lot of us, it was more moving than the actual graduation ceremony (which always seemed rushed, boring, and disjointed).

    Eventually, they had to drop the two prayers and make it into a totally secular celebration, which is perfectly fine. I didn't mind the prayers, but I could see how the diverse population living in our liberal college town might object.

    However, this year they held their final baccalaureate, and will not ever do it again, thanks to the highly agitated protests of a perpetually outraged family. We have one atheist family in town that would file legal actions against oxygen if they could figure out a way to do it. For decades and decades, the many other atheist families in town have managed to maintain a symbiotic cooperation with the town's activities, because they recognized the value of small-town community traditions.

    But this one family. Jesus!

    What keeps coming back to me is the obvious difference between the one family and the rest of the atheist "community" in our town - they're assholes. There aren't any secret, subversive meetings going on as the atheists plot a course to destroy the moral fiber of the community (at least not since the disappearance of Madalyn Murray O'Hare). In fact, it's always been the opposite - all the atheists in town have been happy and content to go along to get along. But the motivation behind this one family single-handedly slamming the brakes on all kinds of community pleasantries has nothing to do with being atheists and everything to do with being assholes.

    They would be jerks no matter what they believed, and I think our whole community gets that. The hero mom in that Oklahoma video (to me) is much more representative of the atheists I have known in my life instead of the rare squeaky wheels that are the ones we refer when we say, "They ruined it for everybody."
     
  2. Tolerance at nearly every level sadly is becoming more rare by the day.
     
  3. fflowley

    fflowley Don't just do something, stand there!

    I feel like I'm missing something.
    If the religious references and prayer were dropped at some point in the past, what were they against?
     
  4. cynthetiq

    cynthetiq Administrator Staff Member Donor

    Location:
    New York City
    The word baccalaureate?
     
  5. warrrreagl

    warrrreagl Slightly Tilted

    Location:
    Land of cotton.
    Yes.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. fflowley

    fflowley Don't just do something, stand there!

    Well ya got me by the sneakers.
     
  7. Raghnar

    Raghnar Getting Tilted

    What's wrong and "religious related" with baccalaureate?
     
  8. Seaver

    Seaver Vertical

    Location:
    Dallas
    I can date my final loss of faith as our baccalaureate actually. The baccalaureate was traditionally held by the multiple Catholic Churches in the area, and it was VERY much a simple celebration of those who had graduated. I lived in South Texas, and our dropout rate was abysmal. Anyways, the Catholic Church reached out to the Baptists and invited them to do the introductory speech, as they were the 2nd largest religion in the town. Their pastor then went on a speech that we should not worship those who had graduated, as we shouldn't worship Mary.. a direct attack on the Catholic Church.

    The only word that could describe the fall out would be abortion. I'm honestly amazed there was not a fight that broke out, but it ceased being about the graduates and more about the white/latino crowd in the town. A town I later found out was a stronghold of the South Texas KKK back in the day.

    /cool story bro

    And Raghnar, it dates back to the medieval period where all schools of learning were church sponsored;

    The baccalaureate service derives from the medieval European custom of presenting the candidates for the degree of Bachelor (bacca) with laurels (lauri) of sermonic oration. The Baccalaureate ceremony is a service of worship in celebration of and thanksgiving for lives dedicated to learning and wisdom.
     
  9. Lindy

    Lindy Moderator Staff Member

    Location:
    Nebraska
    Religious fundamentalists are bad enough...

    Is there anything worse than a militant, fundamentalist, evangelical, proselytizing atheist?

    Can you find some way to send them off to do their missionary work in someplace like, say, Iran?
     
  10. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    I'd consider religious fundamentalists worse, if we are going to generalize (which I admit can be a problem if we just leave it a that).

    Also, there isn't really such thing as a fundamentalist atheist, and "militant" plus "evangelical" are more or less redundant in this context, so it only makes sense to call them militant proselytizing atheists. But, yes, they can be annoying. I tend to call these folks chip-on-the-shoulder atheists, and many of them are actually more accurately described as anti-religious. They aren't simply atheists (rejecting a belief in gods). They go a step further.

    Much of the current ado about atheism is the difference between this type of atheist and another type that doesn't usually draw that much attention for obvious reasons. I've heard the difference best described as "dogmatic atheists" vs. "non-dogmatic atheists."

    A key difference:
    Atheist vs. Atheist—What?! | Psychology Today
     
    Last edited: May 25, 2013
  11. Seaver

    Seaver Vertical

    Location:
    Dallas
    Yes... I really hate to start the atheism vs. religion, but people don't commit suicide bombings in the name of atheism.
     
  12. Charlatan

    Charlatan sous les pavés, la plage

    Location:
    Temasek
    Baccalaureate:
    A college bachelor's degree.
    An examination intended to qualify successful candidates for higher education.


    I have no religious association with the word. Believe me, my son graduated with an International Baccalaureate. If there was even a wiff of religion I would know about it.
     
  13. Joniemack

    Joniemack Beta brainwaves in session

    Location:
    Reading, UK
    I fail to see any difference at all between assholes bent on forcefully shoving their own agenda down someone else's throat.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  14. TheSurgeOn

    TheSurgeOn Getting Tilted

    Location:
    England
    The Oxford English dictionary defines Baccalaureate;http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/baccalaureate

    • 3US a religious service held at some educational institutions before commencement, including a farewell sermon to the graduating students.

      In the context given by the OP it is a religious service. The atheists are correct to remove it from a secular school environment.
     
  15. Lindy

    Lindy Moderator Staff Member

    Location:
    Nebraska
    One difference is in the perception of where the power lies. Agnostics and other "free thinkers" are afraid of the religious right because it is perceived that they hold real power, and seek even more.
    Atheists (in the USA) are not perceived as holding any significant power. And they don't have much.
    Ahem. Except when aligned with the Federal judiciary.;)
    So atheists are mostly just an annoyance when they overpush their agenda.

    In a country where atheists hold real power, they would well be feared. Think the Soviet Union in the 1930s.
     
  16. redux

    redux Very Tilted

    Location:
    Foggy Bottom
    Perception becomes reality when the religious right imposes their beliefs through legislation as has been the case in states across the country in recent years far more frequently than any time in our nation's history.

    Once we allow religious-based laws that a small group of citizens believe are from God, we all begin to lose freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution.
     
  17. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    You're looking only along the lines of nation states. In the West, most scientists are atheists. Sure, being a scientist isn't the same as holding office or being an influential CEO, but I wouldn't consider the broader scientific community as being without any significant power.

    As for the Christian right, what is to be feared is creeping theocracy via infusing Christian dogma into legislation. Atheists who fear that do so on the basis of faith overruling reason.

    Also, about atheists holding real power, there is a distinction to be made: Stalin wasn't just an atheist. He was a tyrant. Be careful about putting the cart before the horse.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. TheSurgeOn

    TheSurgeOn Getting Tilted

    Location:
    England
    Lindy , atheists have no agenda other than there is no god (or gods - there are over two thousand of them 'would you believe?'), just as we believe there are no fairies at the bottom of the garden.

    Unfortunately, people with heartfelt belief in the weird and wonderful have ended up calling the shots, (quite literally - just look for a war and there they are). Would you fight the fairy believers or encourage them and their beliefs by letting teach your children?
     
  19. Seaver

    Seaver Vertical

    Location:
    Dallas
    Atheists simply want to separate the governments from religious institutions for the mere fact that it's what the constitution requires. If one religion is recognized by the government, they all have to be. Since they all can't be, none should.

    It's not atheists that are pushing to force trans-vaginal ultrasounds in a situation of exercising Supreme Court approved rights.
    It's not atheists that prevented the building of a religious exercise center 6 blocks away from the Twin Towers because they're the wrong religion.
    It wasn't atheists that fought so long and hard to prevent two couples from marrying due to their color.
    It's not atheists who continue to fight so long and hard to prevent two couples from marrying due to having the same X/Y count.

    I could go on... but you get it. If you think atheists have the real power you need to get off the cross and realize the Constitution has the power and the atheists are simply right sometimes.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. Lindy

    Lindy Moderator Staff Member

    Location:
    Nebraska
    So much for the attempt at tongue-in-cheek.:rolleyes:
    What I was attempting to say was that every time a judge sides with an atheist, the atheists are perceived to have more power than they really do. And religious conservatives will complain that atheists control the judiciary.
    It may seem that way, but if you read a little history you can easily see that this is simply not true.

    All you have to do is look back fifty or a hundred years and you will see a much stronger religious influence in both law and culture.
    As examples I would cite the Eighteenth Amendment, (prohibition) repressive laws against birth control, (never mind abortion) censorship of literature and film, forcing business to close on Sundays, (commonly called "blue laws") concerns about the first loyalty of a Roman Catholic President (Al Smith in 1928 and JFK in 1960.)

    In spite of all the noise coming from the religious right, there is probably MUCH LESS religious influence in public life now than in the past.